Important Commissions and Committees of India for Exams
Complete notes on India's commissions and committees for exams: chairperson, year and subject of each, with constitutional, statutory and executive bodies compared.
By GK24 Editorial Team· Published · 5 min read

A commission or a committee is a body the government sets up to study a problem and report on it. Almost every reform in independent India began as such a report, which is why static general knowledge papers carry at least one question on them in every shift. The examinable material is small and fixed: the name of the body, the name of its chairperson, the year it was appointed, and the one recommendation it is remembered for. This note arranges them by subject so that the chairperson and the subject stay tied together.
Constitutional, statutory and executive bodies
Before the list, fix the three categories, because papers ask which kind a body is. A constitutional body is created by the Constitution itself and can be changed only by amendment: the Union Public Service Commission under Article 315, the Election Commission under Article 324, the Finance Commission under Article 280, the Comptroller and Auditor General under Article 148, the National Commission for Scheduled Castes under Article 338, the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes under Article 338A, the National Commission for Backward Classes under Article 338B, and the Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities under Article 350B. A statutory body is created by an Act of Parliament: the National Human Rights Commission under the Protection of Human Rights Act of 1993, the National Commission for Women under the Act of 1990, the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights under the Act of 2005, the Central Vigilance Commission under the Act of 2003, the Central Information Commission under the Right to Information Act of 2005 and the Lokpal under the Act of 2013. An executive or non-statutory body is created by a resolution of the government, like the Planning Commission of 1950 and NITI Aayog, which replaced it in 2015.
Backward classes and social justice
The First Backward Classes Commission was appointed in 1953 under Kaka Kalelkar and reported in 1955, but its report was not acted upon. The Second Backward Classes Commission, universally called the Mandal Commission, was appointed in 1979 under Bindheshwari Prasad Mandal by the Morarji Desai government; it reported in 1980 and recommended twenty-seven per cent reservation in central government jobs and educational institutions for Other Backward Classes. The recommendation was implemented in 1990 by the V. P. Singh government and upheld with conditions in the Indra Sawhney judgment of 1992. The Sachar Committee of 2005 under Justice Rajinder Sachar studied the social, economic and educational status of Muslims and reported in 2006.
Education commissions
Three commissions shaped Indian education. The University Education Commission of 1948 was chaired by Dr S. Radhakrishnan and dealt with higher education. The Secondary Education Commission of 1952 was chaired by Dr A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar. The Education Commission of 1964 to 1966, known as the Kothari Commission after Dr Daulat Singh Kothari, was the first to cover education at every stage; it proposed the ten plus two plus three pattern, the three-language formula, free and compulsory education to the age of fourteen and public spending of six per cent of national income on education. All three agreed that the mother tongue is the best medium at the primary stage. Under colonial rule, the Indian Education Commission of 1882 under William Hunter and the Sadler Commission of 1917 on universities had played the same role.
Federalism and local government
The Dhar Commission of 1948 and the JVP Committee of 1949, named after Jawaharlal Nehru, Vallabhbhai Patel and Pattabhi Sitaramayya, examined the demand for linguistic states and advised against it. The States Reorganisation Commission of 1953 under Justice Fazl Ali, with H. N. Kunzru and K. M. Panikkar as members, reported in 1955 and led to the States Reorganisation Act of 1956. On Centre-State relations the Sarkaria Commission was appointed in 1983 under Justice R. S. Sarkaria and reported in 1988; the Punchhi Commission was appointed in 2007 under Justice Madan Mohan Punchhi and reported in 2010. For local government, the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee of 1957 recommended the three-tier panchayati raj system of village panchayat, panchayat samiti and zila parishad; the Ashok Mehta Committee of 1977 recommended a two-tier system; the G. V. K. Rao Committee of 1985 and the L. M. Singhvi Committee of 1986 called for constitutional status, which came with the seventy-third amendment.
Economy, banking and administration
| Committee or commission | Year | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| Narasimham Committee I and II | 1991 and 1998 | Banking sector reforms |
| Chelliah Committee | 1991 | Tax reforms |
| Malhotra Committee | 1993 | Insurance reform, led to the insurance regulator |
| Tandon Committee | 1974 | Bank credit for working capital |
| Rangarajan Committee | 2012 | Measurement of poverty |
| Tendulkar Committee | 2009 | Poverty line methodology |
| Urjit Patel Committee | 2014 | Monetary policy framework and inflation targeting |
| Nachiket Mor Committee | 2013 | Financial services for small businesses and low-income households |
| Swaminathan Commission | 2004 | National Commission on Farmers |
| Santhanam Committee | 1962 | Corruption, led to the Central Vigilance Commission in 1964 |
| First and Second Administrative Reforms Commissions | 1966 and 2005 | Reform of public administration |
Commissions of inquiry
Commissions of inquiry are appointed under the Commissions of Inquiry Act of 1952 to examine a specific event. The Shah Commission of 1977 under Justice J. C. Shah inquired into the excesses of the Emergency. The Liberhan Commission of 1992 inquired into the demolition of the Babri structure and reported in 2009, making it one of the longest-running inquiries. The Justice J. S. Verma Committee of 2013 recommended changes in criminal law on offences against women and led to the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 2013. The B. N. Srikrishna Committee of 2010 examined the demand for Telangana. On the environment, the Madhav Gadgil panel of 2011 and the Kasturirangan panel of 2013 reported on the Western Ghats.
Exam Point of View
Questions come in three shapes. The first asks the chairperson of a named commission, so learn Mandal with the Second Backward Classes Commission, Kalelkar with the first, Fazl Ali with the States Reorganisation Commission, Sarkaria and Punchhi with Centre-State relations, Kothari with education and Balwant Rai Mehta with panchayati raj. The second asks the year of appointment, where 1953, 1957, 1966, 1979 and 2005 recur. The third asks which category a body belongs to, testing whether you can separate a constitutional body such as the Finance Commission from a statutory one such as the National Human Rights Commission and from an executive body such as NITI Aayog. The usual traps are swapping the two backward classes commissions, confusing Balwant Rai Mehta with Ashok Mehta, and treating the NHRC or the CVC as constitutional.
Important Facts
| Mandal Commission | Second Backward Classes Commission, appointed 1979, chairman B. P. Mandal, report 1980, 27 per cent OBC reservation |
|---|---|
| First Backward Classes Commission | Appointed 1953, chairman Kaka Kalelkar, report 1955 |
| Kothari Commission | Education Commission 1964 to 1966, chairman D. S. Kothari |
| University Education Commission | 1948, chairman Dr S. Radhakrishnan |
| Secondary Education Commission | 1952, chairman Dr A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar |
| States Reorganisation Commission | 1953, chairman Justice Fazl Ali, with H. N. Kunzru and K. M. Panikkar |
| Panchayati raj committees | Balwant Rai Mehta 1957, Ashok Mehta 1977, G. V. K. Rao 1985, L. M. Singhvi 1986 |
| Centre-State relations | Sarkaria Commission 1983, Punchhi Commission 2007 |
| Santhanam Committee | 1962, on corruption; the Central Vigilance Commission followed in 1964 |
| Swaminathan Commission | National Commission on Farmers, 2004, chairman M. S. Swaminathan |
| Commissions of Inquiry Act | 1952, the law under which inquiry commissions such as the Shah and Liberhan Commissions are appointed |
Practice MCQs on this topic
In which of the following years did the Government of India appoint the Second Backward Classes Commission?
- A.1990
- B.1972
- C.1967
- D.1979
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is D, 1979. The Second Backward Classes Commission, known as the Mandal Commission after its chairman Bindheshwari Prasad Mandal, was appointed on the first of January 1979 by the Janata Party government of Morarji Desai under Article 340 of the Constitution. It submitted its report in December 1980, identified a long list of socially and educationally backward communities and recommended twenty-seven per cent reservation for Other Backward Classes in central government services and in central educational institutions. Option A is wrong because 1990 is the year the recommendation was implemented, when the V. P. Singh government issued the office memorandum on OBC reservation, not the year of appointment. Option B is wrong because no backward classes commission was appointed in 1972. Option C is wrong because 1967 relates to the first Administrative Reforms Commission period and to the general elections of that year, not to this commission. The First Backward Classes Commission under Kaka Kalelkar had been appointed in 1953.
According to education commissions which language should be used in primary education for a better understanding of students?
- A.Regional Language
- B.English Language
- C.Official Language
- D.Mother Tongue
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is D, Mother Tongue. Every major Indian education commission has held that a child learns best in the language spoken at home. The Secondary Education Commission of 1952 under Dr A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar and the Education Commission of 1964 to 1966 under Dr D. S. Kothari both said the mother tongue should be the medium at the primary stage, and the Kothari Commission built its three-language formula on that base. The National Policy on Education and later policy documents repeat the same position. Option A is wrong because the regional language of a state may not be the language a particular child speaks, as with a tribal or migrant child, so it is a weaker rule than the mother tongue. Option B is wrong because introducing English as the medium at the primary stage works against comprehension, though it is taught as a language. Option C is wrong because the official language, Hindi or English for Union purposes, is chosen for administration and not for the comprehension of young learners.
Who was the chairman of the First Backward Classes Commission of India?
- A.Kaka Kalelkar
- B.B. P. Mandal
- C.Rajinder Sachar
- D.R. S. Sarkaria
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is A, Kaka Kalelkar. The First Backward Classes Commission was appointed in January 1953 under Article 340 with Dattatreya Balkrishna Kalelkar, known as Kaka Kalelkar, as chairman, and it submitted its report in 1955. It listed more than two thousand communities as backward but the government rejected the report, in part because the chairman added a note of dissent doubting whether caste should be the test of backwardness. Option B is wrong because B. P. Mandal chaired the Second Backward Classes Commission of 1979. Option C is wrong because Justice Rajinder Sachar chaired the committee of 2005 on the status of Muslims in India. Option D is wrong because Justice R. S. Sarkaria chaired the commission of 1983 on Centre-State relations. Keeping the two backward classes commissions apart by chairman and year is the quickest way to answer this family of questions.
Which committee recommended the three-tier structure of panchayati raj in India?
- A.Ashok Mehta Committee
- B.Balwant Rai Mehta Committee
- C.L. M. Singhvi Committee
- D.G. V. K. Rao Committee
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B, the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee. Appointed in 1957 to examine the working of the community development programme, it reported that development could not succeed without democratic decentralisation and recommended a three-tier structure: the gram panchayat at the village level, the panchayat samiti at the block level and the zila parishad at the district level, with elected bodies at the base. Rajasthan was the first state to adopt the system, inaugurated at Nagaur in October 1959, followed by Andhra Pradesh. Option A is wrong because the Ashok Mehta Committee of 1977 recommended a two-tier system with the mandal panchayat and the zila parishad. Option C is wrong because the L. M. Singhvi Committee of 1986 recommended constitutional status for panchayats and the creation of nyaya panchayats. Option D is wrong because the G. V. K. Rao Committee of 1985 recommended that the district be the unit of planning with a district development commissioner.
The Sarkaria Commission, appointed in 1983, examined which subject?
- A.Reform of the banking sector
- B.Centre-State relations
- C.Reorganisation of states on a linguistic basis
- D.Measurement of poverty
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B, Centre-State relations. The commission was appointed in 1983 under Justice Ranjit Singh Sarkaria, a retired judge of the Supreme Court, to review the working arrangements between the Union and the states. It reported in 1988 with recommendations that included the creation of the Inter-State Council, sparing use of Article 356, consultation with states before legislating on subjects in the Concurrent List, and appointment of Governors who are detached from local politics. Option A is wrong because banking reform was the work of the Narasimham Committees of 1991 and 1998. Option C is wrong because linguistic reorganisation was examined by the Dhar Commission of 1948, the JVP Committee of 1949 and the States Reorganisation Commission of 1953. Option D is wrong because poverty measurement was studied by the Lakdawala, Tendulkar and Rangarajan committees.
The ten plus two plus three pattern of education in India was recommended by
- A.The Radhakrishnan Commission
- B.The Mudaliar Commission
- C.The Kothari Commission
- D.The Hunter Commission
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is C, the Kothari Commission. The Education Commission of 1964 to 1966, chaired by the physicist Dr Daulat Singh Kothari, was the first body to study education at every stage from the primary school to the university. It proposed a uniform national structure of ten years of general education, two years of higher secondary education and three years for the first degree, along with the three-language formula, work experience in school and public spending of six per cent of national income on education. Its report shaped the National Policy on Education of 1968. Option A is wrong because the Radhakrishnan Commission of 1948 dealt only with university education. Option B is wrong because the Mudaliar Commission of 1952 dealt with secondary education and suggested multipurpose schools. Option D is wrong because the Hunter Commission of 1882 was a colonial body on primary and secondary education.
Who was the chairman of the States Reorganisation Commission set up in 1953?
- A.Justice Fazl Ali
- B.K. M. Panikkar
- C.H. N. Kunzru
- D.S. K. Dhar
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is A, Justice Fazl Ali. After the death of Potti Sriramulu and the creation of Andhra State in 1953, the government appointed the States Reorganisation Commission under Justice Saiyid Fazl Ali, with the historian K. M. Panikkar and the educationist Hriday Nath Kunzru as its other two members. It reported in 1955, accepted language as a basis for reorganisation while rejecting the principle of one language one state, and its work led to the States Reorganisation Act of 1956, which created fourteen states and six union territories. Option B is wrong because Panikkar was a member, not the chairman. Option C is wrong because Kunzru was likewise a member. Option D is wrong because Justice S. K. Dhar chaired the earlier Linguistic Provinces Commission of 1948, which advised that administrative convenience rather than language should guide reorganisation.
The Narasimham Committee of 1991 and 1998 dealt with reform of which sector?
- A.Insurance
- B.Banking
- C.Railways
- D.Agriculture
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B, banking. The Committee on the Financial System of 1991 and the Committee on Banking Sector Reforms of 1998, both chaired by M. Narasimham, a former Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, set the agenda for liberalising Indian banking. Their recommendations included reducing the statutory liquidity ratio and the cash reserve ratio, introducing prudential norms for capital adequacy and income recognition, allowing new private banks, giving public sector banks operational autonomy, setting up debt recovery tribunals and asset reconstruction, and moving towards stronger and fewer banks through mergers. Option A is wrong because insurance reform was recommended by the Malhotra Committee of 1993, which led to the insurance regulator and private entry. Option C is wrong because railway restructuring was examined by the Bibek Debroy Committee. Option D is wrong because farming was the subject of the Swaminathan Commission of 2004.
The National Commission on Farmers set up in 2004 was chaired by
- A.M. S. Swaminathan
- B.Verghese Kurien
- C.Norman Borlaug
- D.Ashok Gulati
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is A, M. S. Swaminathan. The National Commission on Farmers was set up in 2004 and from its second term was chaired by the agricultural scientist Professor M. S. Swaminathan, the geneticist associated with the Green Revolution in India. The commission submitted five reports between 2004 and 2006 and is remembered for recommending that the minimum support price be fixed at least fifty per cent above the weighted average cost of production, along with land reform, better irrigation, cheaper credit and a national food security system. Option B is wrong because Verghese Kurien led the dairy cooperative movement and Operation Flood. Option C is wrong because Norman Borlaug was the American scientist who bred the high-yielding wheat varieties used in the Green Revolution, not the head of an Indian commission. Option D is wrong because Ashok Gulati is an agricultural economist who chaired the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices, a different body.
The Central Vigilance Commission was set up in 1964 on the recommendation of which committee?
- A.Santhanam Committee
- B.Gorwala Committee
- C.Appleby Committee
- D.Kelkar Committee
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is A, the Santhanam Committee. The Committee on Prevention of Corruption, appointed in 1962 under K. Santhanam, reported in 1964 and recommended a central body to oversee vigilance work in the government. The Central Vigilance Commission was created that year by an executive resolution and was given statutory status by the Central Vigilance Commission Act of 2003, after the Supreme Court judgment in the Vineet Narain case. Option B is wrong because A. D. Gorwala reported in 1951 on public administration generally and on the need for an honest and efficient civil service. Option C is wrong because Paul Appleby, an American expert, reported in 1953 and 1956 on Indian public administration and proposed an institute of public administration. Option D is wrong because the Kelkar committees dealt with tax reform and the fiscal responsibility roadmap, not vigilance.
Which one of the following is a constitutional body?
- A.National Human Rights Commission
- B.Finance Commission
- C.NITI Aayog
- D.National Commission for Women
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B, the Finance Commission. It is created by Article 280 of the Constitution, which requires the President to constitute it every fifth year or earlier to recommend the distribution of the net proceeds of taxes between the Union and the states, the principles governing grants-in-aid and other matters referred to it. Because it is named in the Constitution, it can be changed only by amendment. Option A is wrong because the National Human Rights Commission is a statutory body under the Protection of Human Rights Act of 1993. Option C is wrong because NITI Aayog was created in 2015 by a resolution of the Union Cabinet, which makes it an executive or non-statutory body, exactly as the Planning Commission of 1950 was. Option D is wrong because the National Commission for Women is statutory, created by the National Commission for Women Act of 1990.
Inquiry commissions such as the Shah Commission and the Liberhan Commission are appointed under which law?
- A.The Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952
- B.The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
- C.The Judicial Officers Protection Act, 1850
- D.The Public Servants Inquiries Act, 1850
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is A, the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952. Under this Act the central or a state government may appoint a commission to inquire into any definite matter of public importance, and must do so if Parliament or the state legislature passes a resolution to that effect. Such a commission has the powers of a civil court to summon witnesses, examine them on oath and require the production of documents, but its report is recommendatory and the government must place it before the legislature with a memorandum of action taken. The Shah Commission of 1977 on the Emergency and the Liberhan Commission of 1992, which reported in 2009, were both appointed under it. Option B is wrong because the Code of Criminal Procedure governs criminal investigation and trial, not public inquiries. Option C is wrong because that Act protects judicial officers from suits for acts done in good faith. Option D is wrong because the Public Servants Inquiries Act of 1850 provides for inquiry into charges of misconduct against individual public servants.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between the Kalelkar Commission and the Mandal Commission?
Both were backward classes commissions appointed under Article 340 of the Constitution. The Kalelkar Commission was the first, appointed in 1953 under Kaka Kalelkar, and reported in 1955, but the government did not accept its findings because the chairman himself doubted the use of caste as the test of backwardness. The Mandal Commission was the second, appointed in 1979 under B. P. Mandal, and reported in 1980 recommending twenty-seven per cent reservation for Other Backward Classes, which was implemented from 1990.
Which committee recommended the three-tier panchayati raj system?
The Balwant Rai Mehta Committee, appointed in 1957 to examine community development, recommended democratic decentralisation through a three-tier structure of the village panchayat, the panchayat samiti at the block level and the zila parishad at the district level. Rajasthan was the first state to put the system in place, at Nagaur in 1959, followed by Andhra Pradesh.
Is the National Human Rights Commission a constitutional body?
No. The National Human Rights Commission is a statutory body created by the Protection of Human Rights Act of 1993, so Parliament can alter or abolish it by an ordinary law. Constitutional bodies are those named in the Constitution itself, such as the Election Commission under Article 324, the Finance Commission under Article 280, the Union Public Service Commission under Article 315 and the Comptroller and Auditor General under Article 148.
What did the Kothari Commission recommend?
The Education Commission of 1964 to 1966 under Dr D. S. Kothari recommended a common school structure of ten plus two plus three, the three-language formula, work experience and social service in school, free and compulsory education up to the age of fourteen, and raising public expenditure on education to six per cent of national income. Its report was the basis of the National Policy on Education of 1968.
Which commissions examined Centre-State relations?
The Sarkaria Commission, appointed in 1983 under Justice R. S. Sarkaria, reported in 1988 and recommended among other things that the Inter-State Council be set up and that Article 356 be used sparingly. The Punchhi Commission, appointed in 2007 under Justice M. M. Punchhi, reported in 2010 and suggested a fixed procedure for the appointment and removal of Governors and a concept of localised emergency.
Under which law are inquiry commissions appointed?
Under the Commissions of Inquiry Act of 1952. The central or a state government may appoint a commission to inquire into a definite matter of public importance, and Parliament or a state legislature may require it to do so by resolution. Such a commission has the powers of a civil court to summon witnesses and call for documents, but its report is recommendatory and the government decides what action to take.
Sources
- The Constitution of India, Articles 148, 280, 315, 324, 338, 338A, 338B and 340 — Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice
- Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 — India Code, Government of India
- Report of the Education Commission 1964-66 and the National Policy on Education — Ministry of Education





