Skip to content
GK24
GK NotesIndian EconomyEconomic Reforms of 1991

Economic Reforms of 1991: Crisis and the LPG Policy

Notes on the economic reforms of 1991: the balance of payments crisis, the New Economic Policy of liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation, and its results.

By · Published · 5 min read

Economic Reforms of 1991: Crisis and the LPG Policy — GK24 title card
Economic Reforms of 1991: Crisis and the LPG Policy — GK24 title card

In the middle of 1991 India was close to defaulting on its foreign payments. Its foreign exchange reserves had fallen to about two weeks of imports, the fiscal deficit of the Centre was near eight and a half per cent of gross domestic product, inflation was in double digits, and no lender abroad would roll over a short-term loan. The government of P. V. Narasimha Rao, with Manmohan Singh as Finance Minister, borrowed from the International Monetary Fund, pledged gold with the Bank of England, devalued the rupee and then announced a set of reforms that changed the direction of policy the country had followed since 1956. Those reforms are known together as the New Economic Policy, or by the three words liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation.

Why the crisis came

  • Deficits year after year: the government spent far more than it earned through the 1980s and borrowed at home and abroad to cover it, so interest payments themselves became a large part of expenditure.
  • A current account gap: imports grew faster than exports, and the current account deficit had to be financed by borrowing rather than by earnings.
  • The Gulf crisis of 1990 and 1991: oil prices rose sharply, the oil import bill went up, and remittances from Indians working in West Asia fell at the same time.
  • Loss of confidence: non-resident Indians began to withdraw their deposits and credit rating agencies downgraded India, which closed the door on fresh commercial borrowing.
  • Weakness inside industry: licensing, protection from imports and a large loss-making public sector had produced high costs and low quality, so exports could not grow fast enough to pay for imports.

Liberalisation: the state steps back

The Statement on Industrial Policy of 24 July 1991 ended industrial licensing for all but a short list of industries and cut back the list of industries reserved for the public sector. It removed the requirement under the monopolies law that a large firm take the government's permission before expanding, and that law was itself replaced later by the Competition Act of 2002. Import licensing was dismantled in stages, quantitative restrictions were removed and tariff rates were brought down from very high levels. The rupee was devalued in two steps in the first days of July 1991, by roughly nineteen per cent in all; a dual exchange rate followed in 1992, and from 1994 the rupee became convertible on the current account. In the financial sector, the Narasimham Committee of 1991 led to lower statutory pre-emption of bank funds, licences for private banks, prudential norms for income recognition and capital, and statutory powers for the Securities and Exchange Board of India in 1992, with the office of the Controller of Capital Issues abolished so that a company could price its own share issue.

Privatisation and globalisation

Privatisation took two forms: disinvestment, which is the sale of a part of the government's shareholding in a public enterprise, and strategic sale, where management passes to a private buyer. Public enterprises that remained were given more freedom, and the categories of maharatna, navratna and miniratna were created to let the better performing ones invest without case-by-case approval. Globalisation meant opening the economy to the world: foreign direct investment up to fifty-one per cent was allowed automatically in a list of high priority industries and the limits were raised in sector after sector; the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was replaced by the Foreign Exchange Management Act in 1999, so that dealings in foreign exchange ceased to be a criminal matter and became a regulated one; and India became a founder member of the World Trade Organisation on 1 January 1995.

Before and after

FeatureBefore 1991After 1991
Industrial entryLicence needed for most industriesLicensing kept for a short list only
Public sectorReserved a long list of industries for itselfReservation cut back sharply
ImportsQuantitative restrictions and very high tariffsRestrictions removed, tariffs lowered in stages
Exchange rateFixed by the Reserve BankMarket determined, convertible on the current account
Foreign investmentAllowed case by case, usually a minority shareAutomatic route with rising sectoral limits
Capital issuesPriced by the Controller of Capital IssuesPriced by the company, with SEBI as regulator

The committees to remember

CommitteeSubject
Narasimham Committee, 1991Reform of the financial system and of banking
Chelliah Committee, 1991Reform of the tax system
Rangarajan CommitteeBalance of payments and disinvestment of public enterprises
Second Narasimham Committee, 1998Banking sector reform, prudential norms and supervision

What the reforms achieved, and what they missed

Growth of the gross domestic product rose above the rates of the earlier decades, the crisis in the balance of payments passed and reserves were rebuilt, exports and foreign investment grew, and the service sector, especially software and business services, became the fastest growing part of the economy. The consumer gained from choice and from lower prices in manufactured goods. The criticism is equally standard in examinations. Agriculture received less public investment and its growth lagged, so the gap between farm and non-farm incomes widened. Employment did not grow in step with output, a pattern called jobless growth, and much of the new work was informal and without security. Small industry faced competition it was not ready for, and the reforms were seen as urban and middle class in their benefits. Disinvestment proceeds were often used to cover the deficit instead of building assets. The fair conclusion, and the one an answer should carry, is that 1991 changed the framework of the Indian economy decisively, and that the growth it released was faster but less even than the reformers had promised.

Exam Point of View

Questions from this chapter fall into four groups. First, the crisis: the level of reserves, the role of the Gulf war, the pledging of gold and the loan from the International Monetary Fund. Second, the people and the dates, where the pair of Narasimha Rao as Prime Minister and Manmohan Singh as Finance Minister and the date 24 July 1991 for the industrial policy are asked again and again. Third, definitions, and here the three terms must be kept apart: liberalisation is the removal of government restrictions on trade and industry, privatisation is the transfer of ownership or management to private hands, and globalisation is the integration of the economy with the world. Fourth, the institutional changes: FERA to FEMA in 1999, MRTP to the Competition Act in 2002, statutory SEBI in 1992, the abolition of the Controller of Capital Issues, and WTO membership from 1 January 1995. Committee names, above all Narasimham for banking and Chelliah for taxes, are easy marks.

Important Facts

Year of the crisis1991; reserves down to about two weeks of imports
Prime MinisterP. V. Narasimha Rao
Finance MinisterManmohan Singh, who presented the reform budget in July 1991
New Industrial PolicyStatement on Industrial Policy, 24 July 1991
DevaluationTwo steps in early July 1991, about nineteen per cent in all
Gold pledgedGold pledged with the Bank of England to raise foreign exchange in 1991
LPGLiberalisation, privatisation and globalisation
Banking reform committeeNarasimham Committee, 1991; second Narasimham Committee, 1998
Tax reform committeeChelliah Committee, 1991
SEBIGiven statutory powers in 1992; the Controller of Capital Issues was abolished
FERA to FEMAThe Foreign Exchange Management Act replaced FERA in 1999
MRTP to Competition ActThe Competition Act, 2002 replaced the monopolies law
Current account convertibilityFrom 1994, after the dual exchange rate of 1992
World Trade OrganisationIndia a founder member from 1 January 1995
DisinvestmentSale of a part of the government's shareholding in a public enterprise
Main criticismsNeglect of agriculture, jobless growth, pressure on small industry, uneven gains

Practice MCQs on this topic

Q1.Indian EconomyAsked in: Uttar Pradesh · 24 Aug 2021, Shift 2Easy

Who was the Prime Minister during economic reforms 1991 in India?

  1. A.P.V. Narsimha Rao
  2. B.Atal Bihari Vajpayee
  3. C.Dr Manmohan Singh
  4. D.None of these
Show answer

Correct answer: A. P.V. Narsimha Rao

Explanation

The correct answer is A, P. V. Narasimha Rao. He became Prime Minister in June 1991, in the middle of the balance of payments crisis, and his government devalued the rupee, borrowed from the International Monetary Fund and announced the New Economic Policy of liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation, with the Statement on Industrial Policy issued on 24 July 1991. Option C is the trap that catches most candidates: Manmohan Singh was the Finance Minister who presented the reform budget of 1991 and is rightly linked with the reforms, but he became Prime Minister only in 2004. Option B is wrong because Atal Bihari Vajpayee headed governments later, in 1996 and from 1998, when the second generation of reforms and much of the disinvestment took place. Option D is wrong because option A names the right person.

Q2.Indian EconomyAsked in: Delhi · 25 Sept 2021, Shift 3Easy

Removing barriers or restrictions set by the government on trade is known as _______.

  1. A.Globalisation
  2. B.Liberalisation
  3. C.Privatisation
  4. D.Arbitration
Show answer

Correct answer: B. Liberalisation

Explanation

The correct answer is B, liberalisation. Liberalisation means freeing economic activity from government controls: industrial licences, import licences and quantitative restrictions, ceilings on investment and administered interest rates. In India this was the first strand of the reforms of 1991. Option A is wrong because globalisation is the wider integration of a country's economy with the world through trade, investment, technology and movement of people; removing trade barriers helps globalisation but the act itself is liberalisation. Option C is wrong because privatisation is a transfer of ownership or management from the state to private hands, which is a question of who owns a firm rather than of what rules it must follow. Option D is wrong because arbitration is a method of settling disputes outside the courts and has nothing to do with trade policy.

Q3.Indian EconomyMedium

The New Industrial Policy that abolished industrial licensing for most industries was announced on:

  1. A.1 April 1991
  2. B.24 July 1991
  3. C.1 January 1995
  4. D.24 July 1994
Show answer

Correct answer: B. 24 July 1991

Explanation

The correct answer is B, 24 July 1991. The Statement on Industrial Policy of that date ended licensing for all industries except a short reserved list, cut back the industries kept for the public sector, removed the requirement of prior government approval for expansion by large firms under the monopolies law, and allowed foreign direct investment up to fifty-one per cent automatically in a list of high priority industries. Option A is wrong because 1 April is the beginning of the financial year and no such policy was issued that day. Option C is wrong because 1 January 1995 is the date on which India became a founder member of the World Trade Organisation. Option D is wrong because it moves the right day into the wrong year, a common form of trap in date questions.

Q4.Indian EconomyEasy

The three components of India's New Economic Policy of 1991 are together known by which acronym?

  1. A.LPG
  2. B.GST
  3. C.MRTP
  4. D.FEMA
Show answer

Correct answer: A. LPG

Explanation

The correct answer is A, LPG, standing for liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation. Liberalisation removed licensing and other controls on industry and trade, privatisation reduced the ownership and the role of the public sector through disinvestment and strategic sales, and globalisation opened the economy to foreign trade, investment and technology. Option B is wrong because GST is the goods and services tax, an indirect tax reform of a much later period. Option C is wrong because MRTP refers to the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969, a law of the pre-reform era which the reforms first amended and which was later replaced by the Competition Act of 2002. Option D is wrong because FEMA is the Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999, one measure within the reforms rather than a name for the whole policy.

Q5.Indian EconomyMedium

Who presented the budget of July 1991 that began the economic reforms?

  1. A.Yashwant Sinha
  2. B.Manmohan Singh
  3. C.Pranab Mukherjee
  4. D.C. Rangarajan
Show answer

Correct answer: B. Manmohan Singh

Explanation

The correct answer is B, Manmohan Singh. As Finance Minister in the government of P. V. Narasimha Rao he presented the budget of July 1991, which cut subsidies, reduced the fiscal deficit, lowered tariffs and set out the framework of the reforms, following the devaluation of the rupee earlier that month. Option A is wrong because Yashwant Sinha was Finance Minister later, in the governments of the late 1990s, and is associated with the second generation of reforms. Option C is wrong because Pranab Mukherjee had been Finance Minister in the 1980s and returned to the office only in 2009. Option D is wrong because C. Rangarajan was a central banker and economist who chaired committees on the balance of payments and on disinvestment, but he did not present a budget.

Q6.Indian EconomyMedium

In the first days of July 1991 the Indian rupee was:

  1. A.Revalued upward against major currencies
  2. B.Devalued in two steps by about nineteen per cent in all
  3. C.Made fully convertible on the capital account
  4. D.Pegged permanently to the United States dollar
Show answer

Correct answer: B. Devalued in two steps by about nineteen per cent in all

Explanation

The correct answer is B, devalued in two steps by about nineteen per cent in all. The Reserve Bank lowered the value of the rupee on 1 July and again on 3 July 1991 to make exports cheaper abroad, discourage imports and restore confidence in the currency during the crisis. Option A is wrong because a revaluation upward would have widened the trade gap, the opposite of what the situation demanded. Option C is wrong because convertibility came later and only on the current account, allowed in stages after the dual exchange rate system of 1992 and completed in 1994; the rupee is still not fully convertible on the capital account. Option D is wrong because the reforms moved India away from a fixed rate towards a market determined exchange rate, not towards a permanent peg.

Q7.Indian EconomyHard

The committee appointed in 1991 to recommend reform of the financial system and banking was headed by:

  1. A.Raja J. Chelliah
  2. B.M. Narasimham
  3. C.C. Rangarajan
  4. D.Bimal Jalan
Show answer

Correct answer: B. M. Narasimham

Explanation

The correct answer is B, M. Narasimham. His committee of 1991 recommended reducing the statutory pre-emption of bank funds through the Cash Reserve Ratio and the Statutory Liquidity Ratio, allowing new private banks, introducing prudential norms for the recognition of income and for capital adequacy, and giving banks freedom in branch expansion; a second committee under him reported in 1998 on supervision and consolidation. Option A is wrong because Raja Chelliah headed the tax reforms committee of the same period, and pairing him with taxes and Narasimham with banking is the distinction being tested. Option C is wrong because C. Rangarajan chaired committees on the balance of payments and on disinvestment. Option D is wrong because Bimal Jalan is associated with later work, including a committee on the economic capital framework of the Reserve Bank.

Q8.Indian EconomyMedium

The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was replaced by which law, and in which year?

  1. A.The Competition Act, 2002
  2. B.The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999
  3. C.The Foreign Trade Policy, 1992
  4. D.The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002
Show answer

Correct answer: B. The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999

Explanation

The correct answer is B, the Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999. The older Act of 1973 treated a breach of exchange control as a criminal offence and presumed guilt; the new Act treats most breaches as civil contraventions punishable with a penalty, and its purpose is stated as facilitating external trade and payments and the orderly development of the foreign exchange market. Option A is wrong because the Competition Act of 2002 replaced the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, a different law of the pre-reform era. Option C is wrong because the export and import policy of 1992 liberalised trade licensing but did not replace the exchange law. Option D is wrong because the money laundering Act of 2002 deals with the proceeds of crime and was enacted for a different purpose altogether.

Q9.Indian EconomyMedium

India became a founder member of the World Trade Organisation with effect from:

  1. A.24 July 1991
  2. B.1 January 1995
  3. C.1 April 1997
  4. D.1 January 2000
Show answer

Correct answer: B. 1 January 1995

Explanation

The correct answer is B, 1 January 1995. The World Trade Organisation came into being on that date at the end of the Uruguay Round of negotiations, taking the place of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade of 1947, and India, having been a party to the GATT, became a founder member. Membership required India to bind its tariffs, phase out quantitative restrictions on imports and accept agreements on agriculture, services and intellectual property. Option A is wrong because 24 July 1991 is the date of the Statement on Industrial Policy. Option C is wrong because no such landmark falls on 1 April 1997 in this context. Option D is wrong because by 2000 India was already a member and was in fact removing the last of its quantitative restrictions under WTO obligations.

Q10.Indian EconomyEasy

The sale by the government of a part of its shareholding in a public sector enterprise is called:

  1. A.Nationalisation
  2. B.Disinvestment
  3. C.Devaluation
  4. D.Deficit financing
Show answer

Correct answer: B. Disinvestment

Explanation

The correct answer is B, disinvestment. It is the sale of a part of the government's equity in a public enterprise, either to the public through the stock market or to institutional and strategic buyers; when a majority holding is sold and management also passes to the buyer, it is called a strategic sale. Option A is wrong because nationalisation is the opposite process, the transfer of a private undertaking to state ownership, as with the banks in 1969 and 1980. Option C is wrong because devaluation is a reduction in the external value of the currency, which is a matter of exchange rate policy. Option D is wrong because deficit financing means meeting government expenditure by borrowing or by creating money, which is how the deficits of the 1980s were financed in the first place.

Q11.Indian EconomyHard

The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 was replaced by:

  1. A.The Competition Act, 2002
  2. B.The Companies Act, 2013
  3. C.The Industrial Disputes Act
  4. D.The Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Show answer

Correct answer: A. The Competition Act, 2002

Explanation

The correct answer is A, the Competition Act, 2002. The older law had treated size itself with suspicion and required large firms to obtain the government's approval before expanding, setting up a new undertaking or merging; the reforms of 1991 removed that requirement, and the Act of 2002 replaced the law altogether, shifting attention from the size of a firm to its conduct, that is to anti-competitive agreements, abuse of a dominant position and combinations, with the Competition Commission of India as the regulator. Option B is wrong because the Companies Act governs the formation and management of companies. Option C is wrong because industrial disputes law concerns employers and workmen. Option D is wrong because the Consumer Protection Act deals with the redress of consumers' grievances, a related but separate field.

Q12.Indian EconomyMedium

At the height of the crisis in 1991, India's foreign exchange reserves were sufficient to pay for imports of about:

  1. A.Two weeks
  2. B.Six months
  3. C.One year
  4. D.Three years
Show answer

Correct answer: A. Two weeks

Explanation

The correct answer is A, about two weeks. Reserves had been drained by years of current account deficits, by the rise in oil prices and the fall in remittances after the Gulf crisis, and by the withdrawal of deposits held by non-resident Indians, and at the worst point they could cover only a fortnight of imports. That is why the government borrowed from the International Monetary Fund and pledged gold abroad to raise foreign exchange. Options B, C and D describe comfortable positions that a country builds up in good years, and reserves of six months or more of imports are considered a sign of strength rather than of crisis. A country whose reserves cover a year or three years of imports is in no need of an emergency loan, which is exactly the contrast the question is drawing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What caused the economic crisis of 1991?

Years of large fiscal and current account deficits financed by borrowing, a rising oil import bill and falling remittances after the Gulf crisis of 1990 and 1991, withdrawal of deposits by non-resident Indians and a downgrade by rating agencies. Together these left reserves sufficient for only about two weeks of imports, and India had to borrow from the International Monetary Fund.

What does LPG stand for in the Indian economy?

Liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation, the three strands of the New Economic Policy of 1991. Liberalisation freed industry and trade from licensing and quantitative restrictions, privatisation reduced the role and the ownership of the public sector, and globalisation opened the economy to foreign trade, investment and technology.

What is the difference between liberalisation and privatisation?

Liberalisation is the removal of government controls on economic activity, such as industrial licences, import restrictions and interest rate ceilings, so that firms can decide for themselves. Privatisation is a change of ownership or management, where the state sells its shareholding in a public enterprise or hands its management to a private buyer. A country can liberalise without privatising, and the reverse.

Who was the Prime Minister and who the Finance Minister in 1991?

P. V. Narasimha Rao was the Prime Minister and Manmohan Singh the Finance Minister. Singh presented the budget of July 1991 and the Statement on Industrial Policy of 24 July 1991 was issued in the same month, so the two names and that date are usually asked together in examinations.

What is disinvestment?

The sale by the government of a part of its shareholding in a public sector enterprise, either to the public through the stock market or to institutional buyers. Where a majority stake is sold and management also passes to the buyer, it is called a strategic sale. Disinvestment reduces the government's holding but does not by itself close the enterprise.

What are the main criticisms of the 1991 reforms?

That public investment in agriculture fell and farm growth lagged behind the rest of the economy; that output grew faster than employment, a pattern called jobless growth, with much of the new work informal; that small industry faced sudden competition; that the gains were uneven between regions and classes; and that the money raised by disinvestment often went to cover the deficit rather than to create assets.

Sources

View all