GIFT IFSC Banks Disburse $52.82 Billion Under RBI Swap Facility

The correct answer is USD 54.02 billion. That is the figure twenty IFSC Banking Units had sanctioned under the Reserve Bank's special swap facility for FCNR(B) deposits as on 31 August 2026, and about USD 52.82 billion of it had already been disbursed. Options A and B are real numbers from the same release but from earlier dates in the same month: sanctions stood at USD 28.60 billion on 14 August and USD 37.26 billion on 21 August. The question is a test of whether the candidate tracks the date attached to each figure, because the amount nearly doubled inside a fortnight. Option D does not appear in the release at all. A useful way to hold the story together is the pair of figures that bracket it: USD 54.02 billion sanctioned and USD 52.82 billion disbursed, the small gap between them being the part not yet drawn down.

The correct answer is the IFSCA Act, 2019. The release describes IFSCA as the unified regulatory authority set up by the Government of India under an Act of Parliament for the development and regulation of financial products, financial services and financial institutions in India's International Financial Services Centres. Its Chairperson is K. Rajaraman. Option A, the SEBI Act, created the securities market regulator and is not the statute behind IFSCA, although securities business inside an IFSC does fall within IFSCA's remit. Option C, the Banking Regulation Act, governs banking companies in the domestic market and is administered with the Reserve Bank of India. Option D, the Foreign Exchange Management Act, deals with foreign exchange transactions generally. Only the IFSCA Act is the founding law, and its year, 2019, is the detail most often asked.

The correct answer is USD 11.12 billion. Indian banks raised that amount through bond listings on IFSC exchanges over the five months from April to August 2026. Option A, USD 9.17 billion, is the part of that total listed in July and August alone, so it is a subset rather than the whole. Option C, USD 11.62 billion, belongs to a different channel entirely: it is the value of External Commercial Borrowings disbursed by IBUs in the same period, with monthly flows rising from USD 1.54 billion in April to USD 3.54 billion in August. The two numbers are close enough that they are easily swapped, so pair each with its channel when revising. Option D appears nowhere in the release. Together the three channels, swap mobilisation, ECB financing and bond issuance, are what the release presents as evidence of a deepening international banking ecosystem at GIFT-IFSC.

The correct answer is K. Rajaraman. He is quoted in the release saying that the rapid scale-up of banking activity at GIFT-IFSC shows the depth and growing international orientation of India's International Financial Services Centre, and that the centre is serving as an effective bridge between global pools of capital and India's financing needs. Option B names a former Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, an office quite separate from IFSCA, though the Reserve Bank is the body whose swap facility is being used here. Option C is not associated with IFSCA in this release. Option D names an official of a multilateral development bank and has nothing to do with the International Financial Services Centres Authority. For revision, tie the name to the institution and to the statute: K. Rajaraman, IFSCA, IFSCA Act, 2019.