In India, Judicial Review implies

The correct answer is A, the power of the Judiciary to pronounce upon the constitutionality of laws and executive orders. Judicial review lets the Supreme Court and the High Courts strike down any law or executive action that violates the Constitution. Its basis lies in Article 13, which voids laws inconsistent with the fundamental rights, and in Articles 32 and 226, which let citizens approach the courts. In Kesavananda Bharati (1973) and later in L. Chandra Kumar (1997), the Supreme Court held that judicial review is part of the basic structure, so it cannot be removed even by a constitutional amendment. Option B is wrong because courts test only whether a law is constitutional, not whether it is wise or good policy; that belongs to the legislature. Option C is wrong because Indian courts do not examine bills before the President's assent; they review laws after enactment, apart from the advisory route of Article 143. Option D is wrong because a court reconsidering its own judgement is the review power under Article 137, a different thing. Exam tip: Judicial review — Articles 13, 32, 226; part of the basic structure; idea borrowed from the USA.