Origin of the Rajputs and Early Dynasties of Rajasthan
Rajput origin theories and their supporters, with the Gurjara Pratiharas, the Chauhans and the Guhils of Mewar, and the inscriptions that fix their lines.
By GK24 Editorial Team· Published · 6 min read

The word Rajput comes from rajaputra, the son of a king, and it appears as the name of a ruling class in western and northern India from about the seventh century onwards. Where that class came from has been argued over for two hundred years, and Rajasthan Police, RPSC, Patwari and REET papers test the argument itself: which theory rests on which text, and which historian held which view. The chapter then moves to the first Rajput houses of Rajasthan, the Gurjara Pratiharas, the Chauhans and the Guhils, whose genealogies are fixed by stone inscriptions rather than by bardic tales.
The theories of Rajput origin
The Agnikula or fire born theory comes from the Prithviraj Raso of Chand Bardai, which says that four clans, the Pratihara, the Chauhan, the Solanki and the Parmar, rose from a fire pit at Mount Abu where the sage Vashishtha performed a sacrifice. It is a bardic account, not an inscriptional one, and later scholars treated it as a legend of purification rather than of birth. The foreign origin theory was put by Colonel James Tod in his Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, who traced the Rajputs to the Scythians of Central Asia on the strength of similarities in warfare, horsemanship and funeral custom; William Crooke supported him. A related view, argued by D. R. Bhandarkar, made the Rajputs, especially the Pratiharas, descendants of the Gurjaras, a people he held to be of foreign stock, and Vincent Smith settled on a mixed origin. Against all of them stood the Kshatriya origin theory, whose strongest voice was Gauri Shankar Hirachand Ojha, the author of Rajputane ka Itihas, with C. V. Vaidya, Dashratha Sharma and Gopinath Sharma beside him; they held that the Rajputs were the descendants of the Vedic Kshatriyas of the solar and lunar lines, and pointed to inscriptions in which the clans call themselves Kshatriya or even Brahmin. A fourth, smaller view derived some clans from Brahmin families, since the Bijoliya inscription calls the Chauhans Brahmins of the Vatsa gotra.
Who held which view
| Theory | Main support | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Agnikula, fire born | Chand Bardai; Suryamal Mishran | Prithviraj Raso; the fire pit at Mount Abu |
| Foreign, Scythian | Colonel James Tod; William Crooke | Customs of war, horse and funeral rites |
| Gurjara descent | D. R. Bhandarkar | The name Gurjara in Pratihara records |
| Mixed origin | Vincent A. Smith | Several strands in the same class |
| Kshatriya, Vedic | G. H. Ojha, C. V. Vaidya, Dashratha Sharma, Gopinath Sharma | Inscriptions and the Puranic lines |
Lineages and the thirty six clans
Rajput houses are classified by lineage. The Suryavanshi or solar line holds the Guhil and Sisodia of Mewar, the Kachhwaha of Amer, the Rathore of Marwar and the Bada Gujar. The Chandravanshi or lunar line holds the Bhati of Jaisalmer, who call themselves Yaduvanshi, and the Tomar or Tanwar. The Agnivanshi line holds the four clans of the Agnikula story. Lists of thirty six royal clans, the chhattis rajkul, appear in the Prithviraj Raso and in the Kumarpala Charita of Hemchandra, and the lists do not agree with one another, which is itself a favourite question.
The Gurjara Pratiharas
The Pratiharas were the first great Rajput power of the region. Nagabhata I, who ruled in about the middle of the eighth century from Bhinmal in the Jalore region, is remembered for checking the Arab advance from Sindh, a service the Rashtrakuta records themselves acknowledge. Vatsaraja and then Nagabhata II carried the house into the long tripartite struggle with the Palas of Bengal and the Rashtrakutas of the Deccan for Kannauj, which Nagabhata II finally took. His grandson Mihir Bhoja, the greatest of the line, ruled from Kannauj and struck coins with the title Adivaraha; he also used the title Prabhas, and the Arab traveller Sulaiman wrote of the strength of his cavalry. Mahendrapala I kept the empire together, and the Sanskrit poet and grammarian Rajashekhara was attached to this court. A branch of the family ruled at Mandore in Marwar, whose Ghatiyala inscription of Kakkuka, dated 861, records the rebuilding of the town, and the Rajorgarh inscription of Mathanadeva of 959 calls its ruler a Gurjara Pratihara.
The Chauhans of Sapadalaksha
The Chahamanas, called Chauhans, ruled the tract known as Sapadalaksha from Shakambhari, that is Sambhar. The Bijoliya inscription names Vasudeva as the founder of the house in about the sixth century. Ajayaraja founded the city of Ajayameru, now Ajmer, early in the twelfth century; Arnoraja had the Anasagar lake dug at Ajmer; and Vigraharaja IV, called Bisaldev, extended the kingdom and is credited with the building later known as Adhai Din ka Jhonpra. Prithviraj Chauhan III, who came to the throne as a boy, defeated Muhammad Ghori in the First Battle of Tarain in 1191 and was defeated and killed after the Second Battle of Tarain in 1192; his court held Chand Bardai, author of the Prithviraj Raso, and Jayanak, author of the Prithviraj Vijaya. Branches of the clan outlived the main line. At Ranthambore Hammir Dev fell to Alauddin Khalji in 1301; at Jalore the Songara Chauhan Kanhadadev was overcome in 1311; at Siwana Satal Dev held out until 1308; and the Hada branch founded Bundi in the thirteenth century, from which Kota later separated.
The Guhils of Mewar
The Guhils take their name from Guhil or Guhadatta, placed in the middle of the sixth century, and their early seat was Nagda near Udaipur. Bappa Rawal, of about the eighth century, is the founder figure of Mewar's power and is linked with the Eklingji temple at Nagda and with the fort of Chittor. The Samoli inscription of 646, from the reign of Shiladitya, is the earliest record of the house, and the Atpur or Ahar inscription of 977, of the time of Shaktikumar, gives its genealogy; the Chirwa inscription of 1273 carries the line further. Jaitra Singh beat back the army of Iltutmish, and Rawal Ratan Singh faced Alauddin Khalji's siege of Chittor in 1303. After that loss Rana Hammir recovered Chittor in the fourteenth century and founded the Sisodia branch, from which every later Maharana of Mewar descends.
Other early houses and the inscriptions
The Rathores of Marwar begin with Rao Siha, whose tradition brings the family from Kannauj in the thirteenth century; the Kachhwahas of Amer with Dulha Rai, who took Dausa in about the twelfth century; the Bhatis of Jaisalmer with Rawal Jaisal, who founded the city in the middle of the twelfth century; and the Parmars with their branches at Abu, Kiradu, Jalore and Vagad. For the examination, the inscriptions matter as much as the kings: Samoli of 646 and Atpur of 977 for the Guhils, Ghatiyala of 861 for the Mandore Pratiharas, Rajorgarh of 959 for the Gurjara Pratihara name, Bijoliya of 1170 for the Chauhans, and Chirwa of 1273 for Mewar.
Exam Point of View
Rajasthan papers split this chapter in two. From the origin theories they ask which text or which historian stands behind which view, so pair the Agnikula theory with the Prithviraj Raso, the Scythian theory with Colonel James Tod, the Gurjara theory with D. R. Bhandarkar, the mixed view with Vincent Smith and the Kshatriya theory with Gauri Shankar Hirachand Ojha. From the dynasties they ask founders, capitals, titles and inscriptions: Nagabhata I with Bhinmal, Mihir Bhoja with Adivaraha, Vasudeva with Sambhar, Ajayaraja with Ajmer, Guhadatta and Bappa Rawal with Nagda and Chittor. The usual traps are counting the Rathores among the Agnikula clans, giving the Bijoliya inscription to the Guhils, and crediting Tod with the Kshatriya theory he in fact opposed.
Important Facts
| Agnikula theory | From the Prithviraj Raso; Pratihara, Chauhan, Solanki and Parmar from the fire pit at Mount Abu |
|---|---|
| Foreign origin | Colonel James Tod, Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan; supported by William Crooke |
| Gurjara descent | D. R. Bhandarkar; Vincent Smith argued a mixed origin |
| Kshatriya origin | G. H. Ojha in Rajputane ka Itihas, with C. V. Vaidya, Dashratha Sharma, Gopinath Sharma |
| Thirty six clans | Lists in the Prithviraj Raso and the Kumarpala Charita of Hemchandra |
| Pratihara founder | Nagabhata I, about mid eighth century, from Bhinmal; checked the Arabs |
| Tripartite struggle | Pratiharas, Palas and Rashtrakutas over Kannauj; won by Nagabhata II |
| Mihir Bhoja | Greatest Pratihara; ruled from Kannauj; coins titled Adivaraha |
| Ghatiyala inscription | 861, of Kakkuka, on the Pratiharas of Mandore |
| Rajorgarh inscription | 959, of Mathanadeva; uses the name Gurjara Pratihara |
| Chauhan founder | Vasudeva at Shakambhari, Sambhar, about the sixth century |
| Bijoliya inscription | 1170; Chauhan genealogy; calls them Brahmins of the Vatsa gotra |
| Ajmer | Founded as Ajayameru by Ajayaraja early in the twelfth century |
| Battles of Tarain | 1191, Prithviraj III won; 1192, he lost to Muhammad Ghori |
| Ranthambore | Hammir Dev Chauhan fell to Alauddin Khalji in 1301 |
| Guhil founder | Guhil or Guhadatta, about mid sixth century; early seat Nagda |
| Samoli inscription | 646, of Shiladitya; earliest Guhil record |
| Atpur inscription | 977, of Shaktikumar; gives the Guhil genealogy |
| Sisodia branch | Founded by Rana Hammir after he recovered Chittor in the fourteenth century |
Practice MCQs on this topic
The Agnikula or fire born theory of Rajput origin is based mainly on which text?
- A.Prithviraj Vijaya
- B.Prithviraj Raso
- C.Rajatarangini
- D.Hammir Mahakavya
Show answer
Chand Bardai's Prithviraj Raso tells that four clans, the Pratihara, the Chauhan, the Solanki and the Parmar, rose from a fire pit at Mount Abu where the sage Vashishtha performed a sacrifice, and from this account the Agnikula or fire born theory takes its name.
Read the full explanation →Which writer traced the Rajputs to the Scythians of Central Asia in his Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan?
- A.Gauri Shankar Hirachand Ojha
- B.Colonel James Tod
- C.C. V. Vaidya
- D.Dashratha Sharma
Show answer
Tod, who served as the Political Agent of the East India Company in western Rajputana, wrote the Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan and argued that the Rajputs were descended from the Scythians of Central Asia, pointing to shared habits of warfare, the place of the horse and certain funeral rites.
Read the full explanation →Which of the following clans is NOT counted among the four Agnikula clans?
- A.Chauhan
- B.Parmar
- C.Solanki
- D.Rathore
Show answer
The four clans named in the Agnikula account are the Pratihara or Parihar, the Chauhan or Chahamana, the Solanki or Chaulukya and the Parmar or Paramara.
Read the full explanation →Who was the founder of the Gurjara Pratihara dynasty, remembered for checking the Arab advance from Sindh?
- A.Vatsaraja
- B.Nagabhata I
- C.Mihir Bhoja
- D.Mahendrapala I
Show answer
He ruled in about the middle of the eighth century from Bhinmal in the Jalore region and is credited with stopping the Arab armies that had taken Sindh, a service which even the Rashtrakuta records acknowledge when they describe the Pratihara as the defender of the west.
Read the full explanation →The Pratihara ruler Mihir Bhoja struck coins bearing which title?
- A.Adivaraha
- B.Prithvivallabha
- C.Vikramaditya
- D.Devaputra
Show answer
Mihir Bhoja, also called Bhoja I, was the greatest of the Gurjara Pratiharas; he ruled from Kannauj in the ninth century, was a devotee of Vishnu and issued silver coins carrying the title Adivaraha, the primeval boar, one of Vishnu's forms.
Read the full explanation →The Bijoliya inscription of 1170 gives the genealogy of which dynasty and calls it Brahmin of the Vatsa gotra?
- A.The Guhils of Mewar
- B.The Chauhans of Shakambhari
- C.The Rathores of Marwar
- D.The Pratiharas of Mandore
Show answer
The Bijoliya rock inscription of Bhilwara district, dated 1170, sets out the Chauhan line from Vasudeva, the founder at Shakambhari or Sambhar, and describes the family as Brahmins of the Vatsa gotra, which is one of the strongest arguments against the Agnikula story of their birth from fire.
Read the full explanation →The Atpur or Ahar inscription of 977 gives the genealogy of which ruling house?
- A.The Guhils of Mewar
- B.The Chauhans of Ajmer
- C.The Bhatis of Jaisalmer
- D.The Parmars of Abu
Show answer
The Atpur inscription, also called the Ahar inscription, is dated 977 and belongs to the reign of Shaktikumar; it lists the Guhil rulers from Guhadatta onwards and is the main inscriptional source for the early line of Mewar, with the Samoli inscription of 646 standing earlier and the Chirwa inscription…
Read the full explanation →In the First Battle of Tarain, fought in 1191, Prithviraj Chauhan III defeated which invader?
- A.Muhammad bin Qasim
- B.Mahmud of Ghazni
- C.Muhammad Ghori
- D.Qutbuddin Aibak
Show answer
Prithviraj Chauhan III beat Muhammad Ghori at Tarain, near Thanesar in present day Haryana, in 1191, and the wounded invader escaped from the field.
Read the full explanation →Which Chauhan ruler founded Ajayameru, the city now known as Ajmer?
- A.Vasudeva
- B.Ajayaraja
- C.Arnoraja
- D.Vigraharaja IV
Show answer
Ajayaraja founded Ajayameru early in the twelfth century and shifted the Chauhan centre there from Shakambhari, that is Sambhar; the name wore down into Ajmer, and the hill fort above the town is still called Taragarh.
Read the full explanation →Hammir Dev Chauhan, the ruler of Ranthambore who fell in 1301, was defeated by which Sultan of Delhi?
- A.Iltutmish
- B.Alauddin Khalji
- C.Muhammad Ghori
- D.Ghiyasuddin Balban
Show answer
Ranthambore fell to Alauddin Khalji in 1301 after a long siege, and Hammir Dev Chauhan died defending it; the Hammir Mahakavya of Nayachandra Suri is written about him.
Read the full explanation →Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Agnikula theory of Rajput origin?
It is the account in the Prithviraj Raso of Chand Bardai that four Rajput clans, the Pratihara, the Chauhan, the Solanki and the Parmar, rose from a fire pit at Mount Abu where the sage Vashishtha performed a sacrifice. Historians treat it as a bardic legend of ritual purification rather than as evidence of descent, since inscriptions of these clans say nothing of it.
Who supported the foreign origin of the Rajputs?
Colonel James Tod, in his Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, traced them to the Scythians of Central Asia, and William Crooke agreed. D. R. Bhandarkar derived the Rajputs, especially the Pratiharas, from the Gurjaras, whom he took to be foreign, while Vincent Smith settled on a mixed origin.
Who founded the Gurjara Pratihara dynasty and what is he known for?
Nagabhata I, who ruled in about the middle of the eighth century from Bhinmal, founded the Pratihara power and is remembered for stopping the Arab armies advancing from Sindh, a service even Rashtrakuta records acknowledge.
Which inscription gives the genealogy of the Chauhans?
The Bijoliya inscription of 1170, in Bhilwara district, which traces the Chauhan line from Vasudeva, the founder at Shakambhari or Sambhar, and describes the family as Brahmins of the Vatsa gotra.
Who founded the Sisodia branch of the Guhils?
Rana Hammir, who recovered Chittor in the fourteenth century after Alauddin Khalji's capture of the fort in 1303. Every later Maharana of Mewar, including Rana Kumbha, Rana Sanga and Maharana Pratap, descends from his Sisodia line.
What are the earliest inscriptions of the Guhils of Mewar?
The Samoli inscription of 646, from the reign of Shiladitya, is the earliest record of the house, and the Atpur or Ahar inscription of 977, from the time of Shaktikumar, gives the full early genealogy. The Chirwa inscription of 1273 continues the record.
Sources
- Inscriptions of Rajasthan, Epigraphia Indica series — Archaeological Survey of India
- Our Pasts II (Class VII), Chapter: New Kings and Kingdoms — NCERT
- History of the state, Government of Rajasthan portal — Government of Rajasthan





