Skip to content
GK24

Indian Polity GK Questions with Answers – Page 10

हिंदी में पढ़ें

Indian Polity multiple choice questions with answers and explanations, 20 per page, for SSC, Banking, UPSC, Railway and state exams.

1380 questions

Q181.Indian PolityAsked in: NDA · NDA-I 2017, GATHard

By fulfilling which of the following conditions can a political party claim the status of a national party ? 1. It secures at least six per cent (6%) of the valid votes polled in any four or more states, at a general election to the House of the People or, to the State Legislative Assembly 2. It wins at least four seats in the House of the People from any State or States or wins at least two per cent (2%) seats in the House of the People (i.e., 11 seats in the existing House having 543 members), and these members are elected from at least three different States 3. The party in question has got recognition as a state party in at least two states 4. It must have its headquarters in New Delhi Select the correct answer using the code given below :

  1. A.1, 2 and 3
  2. B.2 and 4
  3. C.1 and 2 only
  4. D.1, 3 and 4
Show answer
Correct answer: C. 1 and 2 only

The Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 sets the conditions in statements 1 and 2, while statements 3 and 4 misstate or invent conditions.

Q184.Indian PolityAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2022, GKMedium

The issue, 'whether Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is violative of Articles 21, 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India' was decided in which one of the following cases?

  1. A.Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India
  2. B.Vishakha vs. State of Rajasthan
  3. C.Shayara Bano vs. Union of India
  4. D.Naz Foundation vs. Government of NCT of Delhi and others
Show answer
Correct answer: D. Naz Foundation vs. Government of NCT of Delhi and others

In this case the Delhi High Court held in 2009 that Section 377, in so far as it criminalised consensual sex between adults in private, violated Articles 21, 14 and 15.

Q186.Indian PolityAsked in: NDA · NDA-I 2022, GATMedium

Who among the following had the shortest span in office as the Prime Minister of India?

  1. A.Lal Bahadur Shastri
  2. B.Chaudhary Charan Singh
  3. C.Chandra Shekhar
  4. D.H. D. Deve Gowda
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Chaudhary Charan Singh

Among the four, Charan Singh held office for the shortest time, about 170 days. He became Prime Minister on 28 July 1979 after the Janata government of Morarji Desai fell, but resigned on 20 August 1979 without ever facing Parliament, when the Congress withdrew its support.

Q187.Indian PolityAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2021, GKMedium

Who among the following was the Chairman of the National Commission for Review of the Working of the Constitution (2000)?

  1. A.Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah
  2. B.Justice J.S. Verma
  3. C.Justice Ranganath Mishra
  4. D.Justice Y.K. Sabharwal
Show answer
Correct answer: A. Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah

Venkatachaliah. The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution was set up by the Union government in February 2000 under Justice M.N.

Q189.Indian PolityAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2024, GKMedium

Consider the following statements :

1. In India, the Special Marriage Act protects an individual if one enters into an interreligious marriage.

2. Right to marry a person of one's choice is an integral aspect of one's Fundamental Rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

3. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights also resonates marital rights of every adult consenting individuals.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. A.2 and 3 only
  2. B.1 and 3 only
  3. C.1,2 and 3
  4. D.1 only
Show answer
Correct answer: C. 1,2 and 3

All three statements are correct. The Special Marriage Act, 1954 lets any two Indians marry by civil registration whatever their religion, without either partner having to convert, so it is the law that covers inter-religious marriages.

Q191.Indian PolityHard

In which case did the Supreme Court recognise a living will, or advance medical directive, as part of the right to die with dignity?

  1. A.Aruna Shanbaug versus Union of India, 2011
  2. B.Common Cause versus Union of India, 2018
  3. C.Gian Kaur versus State of Punjab, 1996
  4. D.P. Rathinam versus Union of India, 1994
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Common Cause versus Union of India, 2018

A Constitution Bench held that the right to die with dignity is part of the right to life under Article 21, and that an adult of sound mind may draw up an advance directive, popularly called a living will, refusing life support if he later becomes terminally ill or goes…

Q192.Indian PolityMedium

Hussainara Khatoon versus State of Bihar, 1979, is associated with which right under Article 21?

  1. A.Right to a speedy trial
  2. B.Right to privacy
  3. C.Right to shelter
  4. D.Right to a clean environment
Show answer
Correct answer: A. Right to a speedy trial

The petition, India's first reported public interest litigation, brought to light thousands of undertrial prisoners in Bihar jails who had been locked up longer than the maximum sentence for their alleged offence.

Q193.Indian PolityEasy

Article 21A provides free and compulsory education to children of which age group?

  1. A.Birth to six years
  2. B.Six to fourteen years
  3. C.Six to eighteen years
  4. D.Fourteen to eighteen years
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Six to fourteen years

Article 21A, inserted by the 86th Amendment, 2002, says that the State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years in such manner as the State may by law determine, and the Right to Education Act, 2009, works out that promise…

Q194.Indian PolityMedium

In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the right to livelihood is a part of the right to life under Article 21?

  1. A.Olga Tellis versus Bombay Municipal Corporation
  2. B.Chameli Singh versus State of Uttar Pradesh
  3. C.Hussainara Khatoon versus State of Bihar
  4. D.Subhash Kumar versus State of Bihar
Show answer
Correct answer: A. Olga Tellis versus Bombay Municipal Corporation

The Court held that the right to life includes the right to livelihood, because no person can live without the means of living, and that pavement and slum dwellers could not be evicted without a fair hearing.

Q195.Indian PolityHard

Under Article 359, the enforcement of which pair of fundamental rights cannot be suspended during a national emergency?

  1. A.Articles 19 and 21
  2. B.Articles 20 and 21
  3. C.Articles 14 and 21
  4. D.Articles 21 and 22
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Articles 20 and 21

Article 359 lets the President suspend the right to move any court for the enforcement of fundamental rights while a national emergency is in force, but the 44th Amendment Act, 1978, passed after the experience of the 1975 Emergency, placed Article 20, on protection against conviction for offences, and Article…

Q196.Indian PolityMedium

The doctrine that the death sentence should be imposed only in the rarest of rare cases was laid down in which case?

  1. A.Jagmohan Singh versus State of Uttar Pradesh, 1973
  2. B.Bachan Singh versus State of Punjab, 1980
  3. C.Machhi Singh versus State of Punjab, 1983
  4. D.Mithu versus State of Punjab, 1983
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Bachan Singh versus State of Punjab, 1980

A Constitution Bench upheld the death penalty as consistent with Article 21 but held that it may be awarded only in the rarest of rare cases, where the alternative of life imprisonment is unquestionably foreclosed, and that courts must weigh aggravating against mitigating circumstances.

Q198.Indian PolityEasy

Article 21A, which makes elementary education a fundamental right, was inserted by which Constitutional Amendment?

  1. A.42nd Amendment, 1976
  2. B.44th Amendment, 1978
  3. C.86th Amendment, 2002
  4. D.93rd Amendment, 2005
Show answer
Correct answer: C. 86th Amendment, 2002

It inserted Article 21A, which directs the State to provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years, recast Article 45 to cover early childhood care and education below six years, and added clause k to Article 51A, making it a fundamental duty…

Q199.Indian PolityMedium

In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the procedure under Article 21 must be fair, just and reasonable, and not arbitrary?

  1. A.A. K. Gopalan versus State of Madras
  2. B.Maneka Gandhi versus Union of India
  3. C.ADM Jabalpur versus Shivkant Shukla
  4. D.Kharak Singh versus State of Uttar Pradesh
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Maneka Gandhi versus Union of India

A seven-judge bench held that a procedure which takes away life or personal liberty must be fair, just and reasonable, gave personal liberty the widest amplitude, and tied Articles 14, 19 and 21 together as the golden triangle.

Q200.Indian PolityEasy

Which expression is actually used in Article 21 of the Constitution of India?

  1. A.Due process of law
  2. B.Procedure established by law
  3. C.Equal protection of the laws
  4. D.Reasonable restrictions imposed by law
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Procedure established by law

Article 21 says that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law, an expression the Constituent Assembly borrowed from the Japanese Constitution.