Skip to content
GK24

Centre Sets Up Committee to Review Pharma Marketing Practices

The Department of Pharmaceuticals formed a committee under NITI Aayog member Dr. M. Srinivas on 23 October 2026 to review the UCPMP framework.

By Published · 2 min read
Centre Sets Up Committee to Review Pharma Marketing Practices — GK24 title card

Why in News

On 23 October 2026 the Department of Pharmaceuticals constituted a committee to review the regulatory framework for pharmaceutical marketing practices and to recommend stronger oversight of the UCPMP.

The Department of Pharmaceuticals, under the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, has set up a committee to examine the regulatory framework that governs pharmaceutical marketing practices in the country. The panel has been asked to recommend ways of strengthening oversight, monitoring and enforcement so that unethical practices in the pharmaceutical sector can be curbed.

Who is on the committee

Dr. M. Srinivas, Member of NITI Aayog, has been named the Chairperson. The two members are Smt. Preeti Sudan, a former Union Health Secretary, and Dr. Naresh Trehan, Chairman and Managing Director of Medanta. The committee must complete the consultative process it has been asked to carry out and then submit its recommendations within two months from the date of its first meeting.

The code it will study

The Uniform Code for Pharmaceutical Marketing Practices (UCPMP) was brought in during 2015 as a voluntary, industry-led self-regulatory mechanism. Its purpose was to promote ethical marketing of medicines and to regulate the dealings between pharmaceutical companies and healthcare professionals. The Department later issued UCPMP 2024, which replaced the 2015 version and strengthened the framework for putting the code into effect. The 2024 code is the one currently in operation, and the new committee's review begins from there.

Terms of Reference

  • To take a holistic and comprehensive look at every issue connected with unethical pharmaceutical marketing practices
  • To test how well the existing arrangements for monitoring, oversight and enforcement actually work, and to identify what is needed for greater transparency, accountability and effective compliance
  • To examine what is required to strengthen the present monitoring and regulatory framework, and to suggest regulatory, statutory or other measures along with the legal framework needed to implement them
  • To hold discussions with stakeholders, and with technical, professional and domain experts, institutions or bodies, and to weigh their submissions objectively before making recommendations
  • To deliberate upon and recommend on any other relevant issue connected with curbing unethical marketing in the sector

For an aspirant, the point to carry away is the chain of custody over pharmaceutical marketing: a voluntary code of 2015, a stronger code in 2024 that superseded it, and now an expert committee asked whether the monitoring and enforcement machinery around that code is strong enough, with a deadline of two months from its first sitting.

PositionName
ChairpersonDr. M. Srinivas, Member, NITI Aayog
MemberSmt. Preeti Sudan, former Union Health Secretary
MemberDr. Naresh Trehan, Chairman and Managing Director, Medanta

Important Facts

Set up byDepartment of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers
SubjectRegulatory framework for pharmaceutical marketing practices
ChairpersonDr. M. Srinivas, Member, NITI Aayog
MembersSmt. Preeti Sudan, former Union Health Secretary; Dr. Naresh Trehan, CMD, Medanta
DeadlineTwo months from the date of the first meeting
Code under reviewUniform Code for Pharmaceutical Marketing Practices (UCPMP)
UCPMP introduced2015, as a voluntary industry-led self-regulatory mechanism
Code in forceUCPMP 2024, which superseded the 2015 version
Date23 October 2026

Exam Point of View

Remember the expansion of UCPMP, the year it was first introduced (2015) and the year of the code now in force (2024), the parent ministry (Chemicals and Fertilizers) and department (Pharmaceuticals), the chairperson Dr. M. Srinivas of NITI Aayog with members Preeti Sudan and Naresh Trehan, and the two month deadline counted from the first meeting.

Practice Questions

Q1.NationalMedium

Who has been named the Chairperson of the committee constituted to review pharmaceutical marketing practices?

  1. A.Smt. Preeti Sudan
  2. B.Dr. Naresh Trehan
  3. C.Dr. M. Srinivas
  4. D.The Union Health Secretary
Show answer
Correct answer: C. Dr. M. Srinivas

The correct answer is Dr. M. Srinivas, a Member of NITI Aayog, who has been named the Chairperson of the committee set up by the Department of Pharmaceuticals to examine the framework governing pharmaceutical marketing practices.

Q3.NationalMedium

Within what period must the committee on pharmaceutical marketing practices submit its recommendations?

  1. A.Two months from the date of its first meeting
  2. B.Six months from the date of its constitution
  3. C.One year from the date of its first meeting
  4. D.Three months from the date of its constitution
Show answer
Correct answer: A. Two months from the date of its first meeting

The order constituting the committee sets that period and also requires the panel to complete the consultative process it has been asked to undertake before submitting its recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who heads the committee on pharmaceutical marketing practices?

Dr. M. Srinivas, Member of NITI Aayog, is the Chairperson. Smt. Preeti Sudan, a former Union Health Secretary, and Dr. Naresh Trehan, CMD of Medanta, are its members.

What does UCPMP stand for?

The Uniform Code for Pharmaceutical Marketing Practices. It was introduced in 2015 as a voluntary, industry-led self-regulatory mechanism for ethical marketing of medicines.

Which version of the code is currently in operation?

UCPMP 2024. It superseded the 2015 version and strengthened the implementation framework, and it is the code in force when the review was ordered.

By when must the committee report?

Within two months from the date of its first meeting, after completing the consultative process it has been asked to undertake.

Sources