Skip to content
GK24

ICAR and FCI Sign MoU on Safer Foodgrain Fumigation Methods

ICAR and FCI signed an MoU on 30 September 2026 to research alternative fumigation for storage pests in wheat and rice, with Phase-I run by ICAR-CIPHET, Ludhiana.

By Published · 2 min read
ICAR and FCI Sign MoU on Safer Foodgrain Fumigation Methods

Why in News

An MoU between ICAR and FCI, announced on 1 October 2026 and signed on 30 September 2026, starts research on safer and more sustainable alternatives to chemical fumigation in wheat and rice storage.

The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and the Food Corporation of India (FCI) signed a Memorandum of Understanding on 30 September 2026 for research on alternative fumigation technologies to manage storage pests in wheat and rice. The study is supported by the Department of Food and Public Distribution under the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution.

Who runs it

The two-year Phase-I project will be carried out by ICAR–Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology (CIPHET), Ludhiana. It was signed by Dr Nachiket Kotwaliwale, Director of ICAR-CIPHET, and Dr A. K. Sinha, Executive Director (Quality Control), FCI, in the presence of Dr M. L. Jat, Secretary, DARE and Director General, ICAR.

The problem being addressed

India’s grain reserves have long depended on aluminium phosphide and malathion for post-harvest pest control. Repeated use has pushed pest resistance to 72 to 100 per cent in key states, forced more frequent fumigation cycles and raised operating costs, while the chemicals carry respiratory risks for workers and long-term ecological risks.

The three trials in Phase-I

  • Nitrogen gas fumigation, above 99 per cent purity, for wheat stored in metal silos
  • Carbon dioxide combined with phosphine for wheat and rice bagged at FCI and CWC warehouses
  • Carbon dioxide fumigation for bagged wheat and rice kept inside hermetic covers

What follows

After the two-year pilot, Phase-II will become a one-year trial at several locations across different agro-climatic zones, so that region-specific Standard Operating Procedures can be framed. The aim is a set of scientifically validated, scalable and sustainable substitutes for conventional chemical fumigation, answering worries about rising pest resistance, exposure at work, environmental damage and fumigant residues. For an aspirant the signing date, the two bodies, the implementing institute and its city, and the three gases under trial are the examinable core.

The signing was attended by deputy and assistant directors general of the council, along with quality control officers of the corporation and the lead investigator of the project.

Important Facts

AgreementMoU between ICAR and the Food Corporation of India
Signed on30 September 2026
Supported byDepartment of Food and Public Distribution, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution
Phase-I durationTwo years
Implementing instituteICAR-Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology (CIPHET), Ludhiana
Chemicals being replacedAluminium phosphide (ALP) and malathion
Pest resistance in key states72 to 100 per cent
Gases under trialNitrogen (above 99 per cent), carbon dioxide, and carbon dioxide with phosphine
Phase-IIOne-year multi-location trial for region-specific SOPs
SignatoriesDr Nachiket Kotwaliwale (ICAR-CIPHET) and Dr A. K. Sinha (FCI)

Exam Point of View

Remember the two signatories ICAR and FCI, the signing date of 30 September 2026, the implementing institute ICAR-CIPHET at Ludhiana, the supporting department, the two chemicals being replaced, the resistance figure of 72 to 100 per cent and the three gases on trial.

Practice Questions

Q1.Science & TechnologyMedium

Which institute will implement Phase-I of the ICAR-FCI research project on alternative fumigation?

  1. A.ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
  2. B.ICAR-CIPHET, Ludhiana
  3. C.ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal
  4. D.Central Warehousing Corporation, New Delhi
Show answer

Correct answer: B. ICAR-CIPHET, Ludhiana

Explanation

The correct answer is ICAR-CIPHET, Ludhiana, the Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, which will carry out the two-year Phase-I of the project on alternatives to chemical fumigation in wheat and rice. Option A is wrong because the Indian Agricultural Research Institute works on crop improvement and allied research and was not named as the implementing body here. Option C is wrong because, although wheat is central to the trials, the institute at Karnal does not figure in this agreement, which was signed with a post-harvest engineering institute precisely because storage and fumigation are post-harvest problems. Option D is wrong because the Central Warehousing Corporation appears only as one of the warehousing systems where bagged grain will be treated during a trial, not as the implementing institute. The MoU itself was signed on 30 September 2026.

Q2.Science & TechnologyMedium

Which two chemicals has India’s foodgrain storage relied on for post-harvest pest control?

  1. A.Aluminium phosphide and malathion
  2. B.Nitrogen and carbon dioxide
  3. C.Endosulfan and DDT
  4. D.Phosphine and chlorpyrifos
Show answer

Correct answer: A. Aluminium phosphide and malathion

Explanation

The correct answer is aluminium phosphide and malathion. For decades these two have been the mainstay of post-harvest pest control in the country’s grain reserves, and their widespread, repeated use is what pushed pest resistance to 72 to 100 per cent in key states while raising fumigation cycles and costs. Option B is wrong because nitrogen and carbon dioxide are the alternatives being tested under this project, not the chemicals being replaced, which is the exact swap an exam setter would use. Option C is wrong because neither of those insecticides is named in connection with this grain storage programme. Option D is only partly right and therefore wrong as a whole: phosphine appears in the trials in combination with carbon dioxide, while chlorpyrifos has no place in this story at all.

Q3.Science & TechnologyHard

What will the second phase of the ICAR-FCI fumigation project involve?

  1. A.A two-year laboratory study at a single institute
  2. B.A one-year multi-location trial across agro-climatic zones
  3. C.Immediate nationwide rollout of nitrogen fumigation
  4. D.A review of existing chemical fumigation rules only
Show answer

Correct answer: B. A one-year multi-location trial across agro-climatic zones

Explanation

The correct answer is a one-year multi-location trial across agro-climatic zones. Phase-II follows the two-year Phase-I pilot and is designed to test the methods in varied conditions so that region-specific Standard Operating Procedures can be established. Option A is wrong because the two-year, single-institute work describes Phase-I, which ICAR-CIPHET at Ludhiana will run, and not the phase that comes after it. Option C is wrong because no immediate nationwide rollout was announced; the whole point of a phased design is to validate the gases first, including nitrogen above 99 per cent purity in metal silos. Option D is wrong because the project is a field research programme on alternative technologies, aimed at scalable and sustainable substitutes, rather than a paper review of the existing rules.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which institute will implement Phase-I of the ICAR-FCI project?

ICAR-Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology (CIPHET), Ludhiana. Phase-I runs for two years and tests alternatives to chemical fumigation in wheat and rice.

Which chemicals has grain storage in India relied on so far?

Aluminium phosphide and malathion. Repeated use has driven pest resistance to 72 to 100 per cent in key states and raised both fumigation cycles and operating costs.

What will Phase-II of the project do?

It will be a one-year multi-location trial across different agro-climatic zones, meant to establish region-specific Standard Operating Procedures for the new fumigation methods.

Sources

Useful for:SSCSSC CGLIBPS