Skip to content
GK24
Prime
Indian PolityMediumAsked in: UPSC Civil Services · CSE Prelims 2017, GS Paper I

Which of the following are not necessarily the consequences of the proclamation of the President's rule in a State ? 1. Dissolution of the State Legislative Assembly 2. Removal of the Council of Ministers in the State 3. Dissolution of the local bodies Select the correct answer using the code given below:

  1. A.1 and 2 only
  2. B.1 and 3 only
  3. C.2 and 3 only
  4. D.1, 2 and 3

Correct answer

B. 1 and 3 only

Explanation

The correct answer is B, 1 and 3 only. Under President's rule the State Council of Ministers must go, but the Assembly need not be dissolved and local bodies are not touched. When the President is satisfied under Article 356 that the government of a State cannot be carried on according to the Constitution, the President takes over the functions of the State government, and the Governor runs the State on the President's behalf. The Chief Minister and the Council of Ministers are therefore removed in every case. The Legislative Assembly, however, may either be dissolved or only kept under suspended animation, and in the S.R. Bommai case (1994) the Supreme Court held that it should not be dissolved until Parliament approves the proclamation. Panchayats and municipalities carry on under their own laws. Option A is wrong because it includes removal of the Council of Ministers, which always follows. Option C is wrong for the same reason. Option D is wrong because only items 1 and 3 are not necessary consequences. Exam tip: President's rule always removes the ministry; the Assembly may be dissolved or merely suspended.

Practice Questions

View all
Q1.Indian PolityAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2021, GKMedium

Who among the following was the Chairman of the National Commission for Review of the Working of the Constitution (2000)?

  1. A.Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah
  2. B.Justice J.S. Verma
  3. C.Justice Ranganath Mishra
  4. D.Justice Y.K. Sabharwal
Show answer
Correct answer: A. Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah

Venkatachaliah. The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution was set up by the Union government in February 2000 under Justice M.N.

Q3.Indian PolityAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2024, GKMedium

Consider the following statements :

1. In India, the Special Marriage Act protects an individual if one enters into an interreligious marriage.

2. Right to marry a person of one's choice is an integral aspect of one's Fundamental Rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

3. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights also resonates marital rights of every adult consenting individuals.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. A.2 and 3 only
  2. B.1 and 3 only
  3. C.1,2 and 3
  4. D.1 only
Show answer
Correct answer: C. 1,2 and 3

All three statements are correct. The Special Marriage Act, 1954 lets any two Indians marry by civil registration whatever their religion, without either partner having to convert, so it is the law that covers inter-religious marriages.

Q5.Indian PolityHard

In which case did the Supreme Court recognise a living will, or advance medical directive, as part of the right to die with dignity?

  1. A.Aruna Shanbaug versus Union of India, 2011
  2. B.Common Cause versus Union of India, 2018
  3. C.Gian Kaur versus State of Punjab, 1996
  4. D.P. Rathinam versus Union of India, 1994
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Common Cause versus Union of India, 2018

A Constitution Bench held that the right to die with dignity is part of the right to life under Article 21, and that an adult of sound mind may draw up an advance directive, popularly called a living will, refusing life support if he later becomes terminally ill or goes…