A Money Bill passed by the Lok Sabha can be held up by the Rajya Sabha for how many weeks?
- A.Two
- B.Three
- C.Four
- D.Five
Correct answer
Explanation
The correct answer is A, Two. Under Article 109, the Rajya Sabha must return a Money Bill within 14 days, so it can hold the bill up for only about two weeks.
A Money Bill can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha and only on the recommendation of the President. The Rajya Sabha can neither reject nor amend it; it can only make recommendations, which the Lok Sabha is free to accept or reject. If the Rajya Sabha does not return the bill within 14 days, it is deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form the Lok Sabha passed it. Whether a bill is a Money Bill is decided by the Speaker, whose certificate is final under Article 110.
Options B, C and D are wrong because three, four and five weeks are all longer than the 14 days the Constitution allows. A longer delay, of up to six months, applies to an ordinary bill, and such a deadlock can be settled by a joint sitting under Article 108.
Exam tip: Money Bill: Article 110 defines it, Article 109 gives the procedure, Rajya Sabha gets 14 days, no joint sitting.
Practice Questions
View allWhich one of the following statements about the All India Services is correct?
- A.The All India Services may be created by an Act of the Parliament.
- B.The endorsement of the Rajya Sabha is not essential for the creation of the All India Services.
- C.The rules of recruitment to the All India Services are determined by the UPSC.
- D.The conditions of service to the All India Services may be altered by the UPSC.
Show answer
Under Article 312, Parliament may by law create new All India Services common to the Union and the States.
Read the full explanation →Which one of the following statements regarding Uniform Civil Code as provided under Article 44 of the Constitution of India is not correct?
- A.It is a Fundamental Right of every Indian citizen.
- B.The State shall endeavour to secure it for citizens throughout the territory of India.
- C.It is not enforceable by any Court.
- D.It is not enforceable by a Court yet the Constitution requires that as a principle it should be fundamental in the governance of our country.
Show answer
The Uniform Civil Code is not a Fundamental Right. Article 44 sits in Part IV of the Constitution, among the Directive Principles of State Policy.
Read the full explanation →In the context of elections in India, which one of the following is the correct full form of VVPAT?
- A.Voter Verifiable Poll Audit Trail
- B.Voter Verifying Paper Audit Trail
- C.Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail
- D.Voter Verifiable Paper Account Trail
Show answer
VVPAT is a printer attached to the EVM that lets the voter see, on paper, that the vote went to the chosen candidate.
Read the full explanation →Which one of the following regarding the ordinance-making power of the Governor is not correct?
- A.It is not a discretionary power.
- B.The Governor may withdraw the ordinance anytime.
- C.The ordinance power can be exercised when the Legislature is not in session.
- D.The aid and advice of ministers is not required for declaring the ordinance.
Show answer
The Governor issues an ordinance only on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers headed by the Chief Minister.
Read the full explanation →Which one of the following statements is not true of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005?
- A.This Act provides civil remedies to protect a woman subjected to domestic violence.
- B.Only women can make a complaint under this legislation.
- C.Relief may be sought only against the husband or a male live-in partner with whom the woman has lived in a domestic relationship.
- D.The Act includes not just wives but also women in marriage-like relationships.
Show answer
Relief under the Act is not limited to the husband or male partner; a complaint can also be filed against his relatives.
Read the full explanation →