Skip to content
GK24

NBA Crosses ₹200 Crore in Access and Benefit-Sharing Payouts

The National Biodiversity Authority crossed ₹200 crore in cumulative ABS disbursement and sanctioned ₹8.23 crore to 27 State boards and 5 UT councils.

By Published · 2 min read
NBA Crosses ₹200 Crore in Access and Benefit-Sharing Payouts — GK24 title card

Why in News

On 5 September 2026 the Environment Ministry said the National Biodiversity Authority has crossed ₹200 crore in cumulative ABS disbursement and has sanctioned ₹8.23 crore more to 27 State Biodiversity Boards and 5 Union Territory Biodiversity Councils.

The National Biodiversity Authority (NBA) has crossed a landmark in India's Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) framework. Its cumulative ABS disbursement has gone past ₹200 crore. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change announced this on 5 September 2026.

What was sanctioned this time

The NBA sanctioned ₹8.23 crore in fresh ABS proceeds. The money goes to 27 State Biodiversity Boards and 5 Union Territory Biodiversity Councils. It arises from the use of biological resources tied to four vegetable crops. These are bitter gourd (Momordica charantia), okra (Abelmoschus esculentus), chilli (Capsicum annuum) and onion (Allium cepa). The proceeds came from three seed companies that accessed these resources for research and commercial use.

Why States are paid instead of farmers

The resources were bought in the open market or through traders. No single farmer, community or place of origin could be traced. So the beneficiary share is spread among the boards and councils of the States and Union Territories where these crops are grown. The split follows the area under cultivation, as published by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. The method was recommended by an Expert Committee and approved by the Authority.

Who gets the most

Rank among recipientsState or UT
FirstMadhya Pradesh
SecondMaharashtra
ThirdAndhra Pradesh
FourthKarnataka
FifthGujarat
Next in the listOdisha, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal and Uttar Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra are the largest cumulative recipients across the four crops. Madhya Pradesh is carried there by bitter gourd, chilli and onion. Maharashtra is carried there mainly by onion, since it holds more than 49 per cent of India's onion area.

How the money must be spent

The boards and councils must use the funds for activities listed under Section 32(2) of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002. These include preparing and updating People's Biodiversity Registers, conservation of biological resources both in and outside their natural habitat, restoration of degraded ecosystems, strengthening Biodiversity Heritage Sites, building the capacity of Biodiversity Management Committees and improving community livelihoods.

The exercise feeds India's commitments under the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit-sharing. It also serves the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, and in particular Target 13, which asks countries to ensure fair and equitable sharing of the benefits from the use of genetic resources.

Important Facts

BodyNational Biodiversity Authority (NBA)
MinistryMinistry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change
MilestoneCumulative ABS disbursement above ₹200 crore
Fresh sanction₹8.23 crore
Recipients27 State Biodiversity Boards and 5 Union Territory Biodiversity Councils
Crops involvedBitter gourd, okra, chilli and onion
Largest recipientsMadhya Pradesh, followed by Maharashtra
Maharashtra's onion shareMore than 49 per cent of India's onion cultivation area
Basis of distributionArea under cultivation, as published by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare
Legal provisionSection 32(2) of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002
International linkConvention on Biological Diversity, Nagoya Protocol and Target 13 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Exam Point of View

Remember the milestone of ₹200 crore and the fresh sanction of ₹8.23 crore, the count of 27 State boards and 5 UT councils, the four crops, the top two recipients Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra, Section 32(2) of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002, and Target 13 of the Kunming-Montreal framework.

Practice Questions

Q1.EnvironmentMedium

How much fresh Access and Benefit-Sharing money did the National Biodiversity Authority sanction to State boards and UT councils?

  1. A.₹8.23 crore
  2. B.₹82.3 crore
  3. C.₹200 crore
  4. D.₹23.8 crore
Show answer
Correct answer: A. ₹8.23 crore

The release records that the Authority sanctioned that amount in ABS proceeds to 27 State Biodiversity Boards and 5 Union Territory Biodiversity Councils, arising from access to biological resources of four vegetable crops.

Q3.EnvironmentMedium

Under which provision must the State Biodiversity Boards use the ABS funds they receive?

  1. A.Section 21 of the Environment Protection Act
  2. B.Section 32(2) of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002
  3. C.Section 6 of the Wildlife Protection Act
  4. D.Section 15 of the Forest Conservation Act
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Section 32(2) of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002

The release states that the boards and councils are required to spend the funds on the activities listed in that provision, and it lists them: documentation and updating of People's Biodiversity Registers, conservation of biological resources both in their natural habitat and outside it, restoration of degraded ecosystems, strengthening of…

Frequently Asked Questions

What milestone has the National Biodiversity Authority crossed?

Its cumulative Access and Benefit-Sharing disbursement has crossed ₹200 crore. Alongside, it has sanctioned a fresh ₹8.23 crore to 27 State Biodiversity Boards and 5 Union Territory Biodiversity Councils.

Which four crops produced these ABS proceeds?

Bitter gourd, okra, chilli and onion. Three seed companies paid the proceeds for accessing these biological resources for research and commercial utilisation.

Why is the money given to State boards and not to farmers?

The resources were accessed through the open market or traders, so no individual farmer, community or single geographic source could be identified. The share is therefore distributed by area under cultivation among the States and Union Territories where the crops are grown.

How can the boards spend the money?

Only on activities listed in Section 32(2) of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002, such as People's Biodiversity Registers, conservation of biological resources, restoration of degraded ecosystems, Biodiversity Heritage Sites and community livelihoods.

Sources

Useful for:SSCSSC CGLIBPS