Skip to content
GK24
Indian PolityHard

Which committee recommended the repeal of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958?

  1. A.The Sarkaria Commission
  2. B.The Jeevan Reddy Committee
  3. C.The Punchhi Commission
  4. D.The Malimath Committee

Correct answer

B. The Jeevan Reddy Committee

Explanation

The correct answer is B, the Jeevan Reddy Committee. The committee headed by Justice B. P. Jeevan Reddy, appointed in 2004 to review AFSPA, reported in 2005 that the Act should be repealed and that the powers genuinely needed should instead be written into the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The Second Administrative Reforms Commission later endorsed repeal. Option A is wrong because the Sarkaria Commission, appointed in 1983, examined Centre-State relations, particularly the office of Governor and Article 356. Option C is wrong because the Punchhi Commission, appointed in 2007, also dealt with Centre-State relations and revisited the Sarkaria recommendations. Option D is wrong because the Malimath Committee of 2003 examined reform of the criminal justice system as a whole, suggesting changes in the standard of proof and the rights of victims. In exam papers these four names are rotated, so attach each name to its single subject.

Read the full article: Internal Security Laws: UAPA, AFSPA, NSA and NIA Notes

View all
Q2.Indian PolityMedium

Which amendment to the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act allowed the Central Government to designate an individual as a terrorist?

  1. A.The amendment of 2004
  2. B.The amendment of 2008
  3. C.The amendment of 2012
  4. D.The amendment of 2019
Show answer
Correct answer: D. The amendment of 2019

Until then the UAPA allowed the Government to notify only an organisation as a terrorist organisation; the UAPA (Amendment) Act, 2019 added the power to notify an individual as a terrorist and to enter that name in the Fourth Schedule of the Act.

Q3.Indian PolityMedium

Under which section of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 is an area declared to be a disturbed area?

  1. A.Section 2
  2. B.Section 3
  3. C.Section 4
  4. D.Section 6
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Section 3

Section 3 of AFSPA empowers the Governor of a State, the administrator of a Union Territory or the Central Government to declare the whole or a part of a State or Union Territory to be a disturbed area, and that declaration is the condition on which every other power in…

Q4.Indian PolityMedium

Prosecution of a person acting under the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 requires the previous sanction of which authority?

  1. A.The Governor of the State
  2. B.The High Court of the State
  3. C.The Central Government
  4. D.The State Government
Show answer
Correct answer: C. The Central Government

Section 6 of AFSPA provides that no prosecution, suit or other legal proceeding shall be instituted against any person in respect of anything done in exercise of the powers conferred by the Act, except with the previous sanction of the Central Government.