Skip to content
GK24
Indian EconomyMediumAsked in: SSC MTS · 8 Oct 2021, Shift 3

In which year did the Government of India introduce value-added tax (VAT) as an indirect tax in the Indian taxation system to replace the existing general sales tax?

  1. A.2007
  2. B.2005
  3. C.2013
  4. D.2011

Correct answer

B. 2005

Explanation

The correct answer is B, 2005. Value added tax replaced the old general sales tax from 1 April 2005, when most states adopted it on the recommendation of the empowered committee of state finance ministers. The point of VAT is that a trader pays tax only on the value added at that stage, taking credit for the tax already paid on purchases, so the cascading of tax upon tax is removed. Haryana had moved to VAT earlier, in 2003, and a few states joined later, with Uttar Pradesh the last in 2008. VAT on goods was itself absorbed into the Goods and Services Tax from 1 July 2017, though state VAT still applies to petroleum products and liquor. Option A is wrong because 2007 is when the last states were still joining. Option C is wrong because 2013 relates to the debate on the GST bill. Option D is wrong because 2011 is the year the constitutional amendment for GST was first introduced. Exam tip: link VAT 2005 with GST 2017.

View all
Q2.Indian EconomyAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2018, GKHard

Consider the following statements about impact of tax : 1. A tax is shifted forward to consumers if the demand is inelastic relative to supply. 2. A tax is shifted backward to producers if the supply is relatively more inelastic than demand. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. A.1 only
  2. B.2 only
  3. C.Both 1 and 2
  4. D.Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer
Correct answer: C. Both 1 and 2

The burden of a tax falls more heavily on whichever side of the market is less elastic, the side that cannot easily walk away.

Q5.Indian EconomyAsked in: CDS · CDS-II 2017, GKHard

Why was constitutional amendment needed for introducing GST?

  1. A.States were not willing to agree with the Union for introduction of GST without amendment in the Constitution.
  2. B.GST was to be implemented on concurrent base and Article 246 was inadequate for such a case.
  3. C.The Empowered Committee of Finance Ministers had recommended for constitutional amendment.
  4. D.The GST Council had recommended for constitutional amendment so that its power enhances.
Show answer
Correct answer: B. GST was to be implemented on concurrent base and Article 246 was inadequate for such a case.

GST is levied by the Union and the States together on the same supply, and Article 246, which splits taxing powers between them through separate lists, did not allow such a concurrent tax.