Skip to content
GK24
Indian EconomyHardAsked in: SSC MTS · 7 Oct 2021, Shift 1

In which year did the companies IBM and Coca Cola shut down their operations for not being able to comply with the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act that mandated foreign investors cannot own over 40% in Indian enterprises?

  1. A.1964
  2. B.1981
  3. C.1956
  4. D.1977

Correct answer

D. 1977

Explanation

The correct answer is D, 1977. IBM and Coca-Cola wound up their Indian operations in 1977 rather than dilute their holdings to 40 per cent. The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, passed in 1973, required foreign companies to cut their equity in Indian subsidiaries to that level and to obtain permission for most dealings in foreign exchange. This was the high point of a closed, licence based economy, and the exit of two well known American firms became its symbol. Coca-Cola returned only after the reforms of 1991, and FERA itself was replaced by the milder Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999. Option A is wrong because 1964 falls well before FERA was enacted. Option B is wrong because 1981 is after both companies had already left. Option C is wrong because 1956 is the year of the Industrial Policy Resolution, unrelated to this exit. Exam tip: remember FERA 1973, the IBM and Coca-Cola exit in 1977, liberalisation in 1991 and FEMA in 1999 as one chain.

View all
Q2.Indian EconomyAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2018, GKHard

Consider the following statements about impact of tax : 1. A tax is shifted forward to consumers if the demand is inelastic relative to supply. 2. A tax is shifted backward to producers if the supply is relatively more inelastic than demand. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. A.1 only
  2. B.2 only
  3. C.Both 1 and 2
  4. D.Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer
Correct answer: C. Both 1 and 2

The burden of a tax falls more heavily on whichever side of the market is less elastic, the side that cannot easily walk away.

Q5.Indian EconomyAsked in: CDS · CDS-II 2017, GKHard

Why was constitutional amendment needed for introducing GST?

  1. A.States were not willing to agree with the Union for introduction of GST without amendment in the Constitution.
  2. B.GST was to be implemented on concurrent base and Article 246 was inadequate for such a case.
  3. C.The Empowered Committee of Finance Ministers had recommended for constitutional amendment.
  4. D.The GST Council had recommended for constitutional amendment so that its power enhances.
Show answer
Correct answer: B. GST was to be implemented on concurrent base and Article 246 was inadequate for such a case.

GST is levied by the Union and the States together on the same supply, and Article 246, which splits taxing powers between them through separate lists, did not allow such a concurrent tax.