By how much have daily coal supplies to the power sector risen from the September low, as stated by the Ministry of Coal?
- A.About 12%
- B.About 24%
- C.About 36%
- D.About 48%
Correct answer
C. About 36%
Explanation
The correct answer is about 36%. The Ministry of Coal said that daily supplies of coal to the power sector have climbed roughly 36% from the low point reached in September, and that the October average is around 9% higher than the September average. That rise, together with stronger rail movement, is the ministry's main answer to reports of a looming power shortage. Option A, about 12%, is far below the stated improvement and matches no figure given. Option B, about 24%, is also invented and would understate the recovery the ministry described. Option D, about 48%, overstates it; no such number appears anywhere in the clarification. Candidates should keep the pair of percentages apart: the 36% figure measures the gain over the September trough, while the smaller 9% figure compares the whole of October with the whole of September.
Read the full article: Coal Supply to Power Plants Rises 36% From September Low
Practice Questions
Which rake-loading target was achieved on three consecutive days in October 2026, according to the Ministry of Coal?
- A.420 rakes a day
- B.450 rakes a day
- C.470 rakes a day
- D.510 rakes a day
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is 470 rakes a day. Rail loading of coal has averaged more than 465 rakes a day during October, and the ministry noted that the 470-rake target was met on three days running, which it treated as a sign that logistics had strengthened alongside production. Looking ahead, the ministry said loading held in the band of 465 to 475 rakes a day should support further stabilisation and then allow stocks to be rebuilt. Option A and option B name lower daily figures that the clarification never mentions, and both sit below even the monthly average already achieved. Option D names a figure well above the band the ministry wants sustained, so it cannot be the target that was reached. The number to memorise is the target of 470, distinct from the monthly average of more than 465.
The daily drawdown of coal stocks at power plants fell from 0.243 MT a day in September to which level in October 2026?
- A.0.198 MT a day
- B.0.116 MT a day
- C.0.085 MT a day
- D.0.150 MT a day
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is 0.116 MT a day. The Ministry of Coal reported that the rate at which coal stocks at power stations were being drawn down slowed sharply, with the daily drawdown dropping by more than half from 0.243 MT a day in September to 0.116 MT a day in October. The ministry called the position one that is stabilising, while admitting that the rebuilding of stocks has not yet started. Option A, option C and option D are invented levels that appear nowhere in the clarification; option C would also imply a fall of far more than half, and options A and D would imply a much smaller slowdown than the one reported. For the examination hall the useful anchor is the comparison itself: a drawdown of 0.243 MT a day in September against 0.116 MT a day in October, a reduction of more than fifty per cent.
Which two Singaporean institutional investors are named as holding significant investments across the Indian economy?
- A.GIC and Temasek
- B.Temasek and Mubadala
- C.GIC and Khazanah Nasional
- D.NIIF and GIFT City
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is GIC and Temasek. GIC, the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation, and Temasek Holdings are the two Singaporean institutional investors named as having significant investments spread across the Indian economy, and the Union Finance Minister is to hold separate meetings with the chief executives of both. Option B pairs Temasek with Mubadala, which is an investment company of the United Arab Emirates and not Singaporean. Option C pairs GIC with Khazanah Nasional, the sovereign fund of Malaysia, so the pair again mixes countries. Option D names the National Investment and Infrastructure Fund and GIFT City, which belong on the other side of the transaction: they are the Indian platforms offered as routes through which Singaporean capital can participate more fully, including through investment vehicles and funds, and not investors from Singapore.
Who is the President of Singapore, on whom the Union Finance Minister is to call during her visit?
- A.Lawrence Wong
- B.Gan Kim Yong
- C.Tharman Shanmugaratnam
- D.Vivian Balakrishnan
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is Tharman Shanmugaratnam, the President of Singapore. During her official visit the Union Minister for Finance and Corporate Affairs is to call on him as part of a set of high level engagements with the country’s leadership. The other three options are all office holders she is also to meet, which is what makes this question a test of designations rather than of names. Option A, Lawrence Wong, is the Prime Minister of Singapore. Option B, Gan Kim Yong, is the Deputy Prime Minister. Option D, Vivian Balakrishnan, is the Foreign Minister. Questions of this kind are very common in general awareness papers, and the usual trap is to swap the President with the Prime Minister, so learn the four names as a block with their posts attached, and link them to the India-Singapore Comprehensive Strategic Partnership that the talks are meant to carry forward.
What is the approximate cumulative foreign direct investment from Singapore into India between April 2000 and March 2026?
- A.USD 94.68 billion
- B.USD 144.68 billion
- C.USD 194.68 billion
- D.USD 234.68 billion
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is USD 194.68 billion. That is the cumulative figure for foreign direct investment flowing from Singapore into India over the period from April 2000 to March 2026, and it is the number behind the description of Singapore as India’s single largest source of such investment. Option A, at 94.68 billion, and option B, at 144.68 billion, both fall well short of the recorded total and would place Singapore lower in the table of investing countries than it actually stands. Option D, at 234.68 billion, overstates the inflow. Along with the figure, note the window it covers, which begins in April 2000, because the same number is meaningless without the period; and remember the two Singaporean institutional investors named with it, GIC and Temasek, along with the National Investment and Infrastructure Fund and GIFT City as the Indian platforms held out for further Singaporean capital.