In State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal (2010), the Supreme Court mainly
- A.abolished public interest litigation in service matters
- B.compiled guidelines to prevent the misuse of public interest litigation
- C.held that only the Attorney General may file a PIL
- D.transferred all PILs to the High Courts
Show answer
In this 2010 judgment the Supreme Court traced the history of PIL and, worried that the device was being used for publicity, private profit and political rivalry, compiled a set of directions for the courts.
Read the full explanation →