State Exams GK Questions 2026

The correct answer is Hawk Mk132. The Ministry of Defence says the Suryakiran Aerobatic Team flies nine distinctive red-and-white Hawk Mk132 aircraft, licence-manufactured in India by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). These jets have also been modified in India with smoke pods that produce coloured smoke, which let the team paint the sky in saffron, white and green.

HAL Tejas, Kiran Mk II and Pilatus PC-7 are aircraft names that often appear as distractors in defence questions, but the release names none of them as the aircraft of SKAT, so options A, C and D are wrong. When you revise, link the team to its aircraft and the aircraft to its manufacturer: Suryakiran, Hawk Mk132, HAL. Also note the number of aircraft in the display, nine, because SKAT is known as the only nine-aircraft aerobatic team in Asia.

The correct answer is Sundays on Cycle. The Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports said Dr Mansukh Mandaviya led the 91st edition of Sundays on Cycle at Meijō Park in Nagoya, Japan, on 20 September 2026, bringing the Indian diaspora together to cheer for the Indian contingent at the Asian Games. The ride is organised by the ministry with the Cycling Federation of India, the Raahgiri Foundation and MY Bharat, and more than 6000 NAMO Fit India clubs hold it every week across the country.

The Fit India Freedom Run and the Fit India Plogging Run are different fitness campaigns, and the Khelo India Youth Games is a sports competition rather than a weekly ride, so none of them matches the event described in the release. Options A, C and D are therefore wrong. Note the edition number too, the 91st, since questions sometimes ask for it.

The correct answer is Nagoya. Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya, speaking in the city on 20 September 2026, said the Asian Games had begun in Nagoya, Japan, and that India had a contingent of more than 500 young athletes there. On the same day he led the 91st edition of the Fit India Sundays on Cycle ride at Meijō Park in Nagoya with members of the Indian diaspora.

Hangzhou, Jakarta and Incheon are all Asian cities, which is why they appear as distractors, but none of them is the venue named for the 2026 Games; the ministry's release places the Games in Nagoya, Japan. Host cities of major sporting events are a regular one-liner in general awareness papers, so learn the host city together with the host country, and note the size of India's contingent as well.

The correct answer is second. In his message on X, the Prime Minister congratulated Elavenil Valarivan on the silver in the women's 10m air rifle individual event and noted that it was her second medal of the day, which made it even more special. Her first medal that day was the silver she won in the women's 10m air rifle together with Sonam Uttam Maskar and Vidarsa K Vinod.

Option A is wrong because the team medal came first, so the individual silver could not be her first. Options C and D are wrong because the releases of 20 September mention only two medals for her that day, the team silver and the individual silver. Examiners like to turn a detail such as this into a question, so remember the full picture: two silvers, one team and one individual, both in the women's 10m air rifle.

The correct answer is Women's 10m Air Rifle. On 20 September 2026, Prime Minister Narendra Modi congratulated Sonam Uttam Maskar, Elavenil Valarivan and Vidarsa K Vinod on winning the silver medal in the women's 10m air rifle event at the Asian Games 2026, and credited the result to hard work and teamwork. Later the same day Elavenil added an individual silver in the same discipline.

The other three options are genuine shooting events, which is what makes them look plausible, but none of them is the event named in the Prime Minister's message. The women's 10m air pistol, the 25m pistol and trap are separate events, and the releases of that day record no Indian medal in them. Remember the pattern of 20 September instead: both medals mentioned came in the women's 10m air rifle, first in the team event and then individually.

The correct answer is Devika Rani. The PIB backgrounder records that the Dadasaheb Phalke Award was instituted in 1969 and first presented to Devika Rani. The award commemorates Dadasaheb Phalke, who directed Raja Harishchandra in 1913, India's first full-length feature film, and who is honoured as the Father of Indian Cinema.

Nargis and Uttam Kumar also hold a place in the history of the National Film Awards, but for a different first: in 1968 they received the first Best Actress and Best Actor awards, which were then called Urvashi and Bharat. Waheeda Rehman did receive the Phalke award, but for the year 2021, so she was not its first recipient. That rules out options B, C and D. Questions on this award often ask for the first recipient and the year of institution together, so remember both: Devika Rani, 1969.

The correct answer is Gujarat. According to PIB, the President of India will present the 72nd National Film Awards on 22 September 2026 at Ekta Nagar in Gujarat, a town formerly known as Kevadia. The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has decided to hold future editions in different States and cities rather than only in the National Capital, and the Ekta Nagar ceremony is part of that policy.

Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh are not the venue of this ceremony, so options A, B and D are incorrect. The ministry has linked the event to the spirit of Ek Bharat, Shreshtha Bharat, since it brings film talent from across the country to one stage. Expect the venue, its former name Kevadia and the date to be asked together, so learn them as a set along with the edition number, the 72nd.

The correct answer is Anant Nag. The Government of India announced on 16 September 2026 that the Dadasaheb Phalke Award for 2024 will be conferred on Anant Nag, a veteran of Kannada cinema. Born in Karnataka on 4 September 1948, he began his career in the Kannada film Sankalp, made his Hindi debut in Ankur and has acted in more than 300 films across six languages.

The other three names are recent recipients of the same award, but for earlier years. Mohanlal received it for 2023, Mithun Chakraborty for 2022 and Waheeda Rehman for 2021, so none of them is the answer for 2024. Questions on this award tend to pair the recipient with the award year, so it helps to memorise the last four winners in order. The award itself, the highest honour in Indian cinema, was instituted in 1969.

The correct answer is Article 370. The PIB backgrounder on the 72nd National Film Awards lists the Hindi film Article 370, directed by Aditya Suhas Jambhale, as the Best Feature Film. The same film brought Yami Gautam the award for Best Actress in a Leading Role, and Shashwat Sachdev won Best Music Direction for its songs.

Each of the other three films also won, but in a different category, which is exactly why they make tempting distractors. Amaran, a Tamil film, earned Rajkumar Periasamy the award for Best Direction. Kalki 2898 AD, in Telugu, was named Best Popular Film Providing Wholesome Entertainment. Chandu Champion won Kartik Aaryan a share of the Best Actor award, which he holds jointly with Mammootty. When you revise an awards list, attach every film to its category, because examiners like to use the other winners of the same year as the wrong options.

The answer is 3,57,112 rural youth by 31 December 2027. This is the sanctioned target for the fourteen States and Union Territories reviewed in the first phase, and it sits well above what actually starts in October 2026, which is 34,920 young people in 1,164 batches. The gap between the two figures is the point of the review: the Ministry is pressing States to move faster so the target is reached in time.

Each wrong option pairs a real figure with the wrong deadline or the wrong scope. The 5.6 lakh in option D belongs to the national allocation across more than 1,200 projects by 24 States and Union Territories, not to these fourteen. Targets for the second phase run over the two-year period 2026-28 and cover all 31 participating States and Union Territories.

The answer is the Ministry of Rural Development, which is reviewing State readiness and rolling out the second phase of the scheme. The placement of DDU-GKY under Rural Development rather than under Skill Development is the point worth fixing in memory, because the name contains the word Kaushalya and the obvious guess is therefore wrong.

The clue is in the rest of the name: Grameen. The scheme is aimed at poor rural youth specifically, which is what puts it in the rural development portfolio. It is a Centrally Sponsored Scheme, its training is tied to placement rather than ending at a certificate, and courses run from three months up to twelve. The other ministries listed all work on employment or training in some form, which is exactly what makes them effective distractors.

The answer is 34,920. Four figures travel together in this item and the question turns on keeping them apart. 34,920 is the number of rural young people starting training in October 2026; 1,164 is the number of batches they are divided into; 3,57,112 is the far larger sanctioned target for the same fourteen States and Union Territories, to be met by 31 December 2027; and 5.6 lakh is the total already allocated across more than 1,200 projects by 24 States and Union Territories.

So option C is the batch count, option B is the sanctioned target and option D is the wider allocation, each a real figure from the announcement but an answer to a different question. A useful ordering is smallest to largest: batches, then the October intake, then the sanctioned target, then the national allocation.

The answer is the Delhi High Court, which received seven of the fourteen, half the total on its own. Of those seven, two were appointed as Judges and the other five as Additional Judges, a split the release sets out separately and which is itself worth noting.

The remaining seven were divided three ways. Jharkhand took three as Judges, Karnataka took three as Additional Judges, and the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh took one as a Judge. That last court is worth a second look for a different reason: a single High Court serves both Union Territories, which is a fact examiners like on its own. So the order by size runs Delhi, then Jharkhand and Karnataka level, then Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

The answer is the President, after consulting the Chief Justice of India. The release is explicit on both halves: the power is one the Constitution confers on the President, and it is exercised after consultation with the Chief Justice of India. The order of those two steps matters, because a question will sometimes reverse them.

Option C does exactly that reversal and is the strongest distractor. The Prime Minister and the Law Minister have no constitutional role in the appointment itself, which rules out option A. A Governor does figure in consultation for High Court appointments under the constitutional scheme, but the appointing authority is not the Governor, so option D fails on the same point. Hold the pair as consultation first, warrant afterwards.

The answer is fourteen. The Ministry of Law and Justice announced the elevation of fourteen serving judicial officers, spread over four High Courts. The largest share went to Delhi, which took seven of them, two as Judges and five as Additional Judges. Jharkhand received three as Judges, Karnataka three as Additional Judges, and one officer was appointed a Judge of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

Adding those up is the safest way to hold the figure: seven and three and three and one. Candidates who remember only the number of courts, which is four, or only the Delhi share, which is seven, will miss this. The other options are round numbers close enough to be tempting but none of them matches the announcement.

The answer is the Ministry of External Affairs. That pairing is not incidental: the Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation programme is a foreign policy instrument, used to offer training and expertise to officials of other developing countries, so a course aimed at human rights institutions abroad naturally runs through External Affairs.

The other ministries listed all have some connection to human rights work within India, which is what makes them usable as distractors, but none of them is named as the partner here. For the examination, treat ITEC and the Ministry of External Affairs as a fixed pair, and note that this was the fifth edition of the programme, held over six days in New Delhi from 14 September 2026.

The answer is fourteen. Two numbers travel together in this item and are easy to swap: thirty-eight senior functionaries attended, and they came from fourteen national human rights institutions. The institutions are the smaller figure, the people the larger one.

The countries represented were Algeria, Chile, Ecuador, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Oman, Samoa, South Africa, Tajikistan and Zimbabwe, which spans Africa, Latin America, Asia and the Pacific. That spread matters for the framing of the programme, which is built on the idea that institutions doing similar work in different legal systems have a good deal to teach each other. Hold the pair as thirty-eight from fourteen and neither figure will slip.

Note the shape of the programme alongside the figures. It was the fifth edition, it ran six days from 14 September 2026 in New Delhi, and the sessions were interactive rather than lecture-led, covering civil and political rights as well as socio-economic and cultural ones.

The answer is Justice V. Ramasubramanian, who chairs the National Human Rights Commission of India and closed the programme. His theme was cooperation between human rights institutions across the Global South, and his argument was that these bodies improve by sharing experience openly, naming the problems they run into and treating their own mistakes as something to learn from.

The other options are drawn from offices that sound plausible for a human rights event but had no role here. The Ministry of External Affairs did partner on the programme, which makes option D the strongest distractor, but the valedictory address came from the Commission's own Chairperson. Present at the session were Joint Secretaries Shri Samir Kumar and Smt. Saidingpuii Chhakchhuak. Remember the Chairperson's name; it is the single most reusable fact here.

The correct answer is Kadha Rasa Sangama - Confluence of Essence of Stories. The Ministry of Culture describes the three-day festival as being held on this theme, bringing together three prominent Kathakali institutions, namely Sadanam Academy, Kerala Kalamandalam and Margi Theatre, each of which presents one distinctive production.

The other three options are plausible-sounding titles that the release does not mention anywhere, and none of them is connected with this festival. The theme is worth memorising alongside the three productions it frames: Mandodari from Sadanam Academy, drawn from the Ramayana; The Old Man and the Sea from Kerala Kalamandalam, adapted from Ernest Hemingway's novel; and Rugmangada Charitham from Margi Theatre, on the devotion of King Rugmangada and his observance of Ekadasi.

The correct answer is 1936. According to the Ministry of Culture, the Kalakshetra Foundation was established in 1936 by Rukmini Devi Arundale, and it has since played a significant role in the preservation, practice and dissemination of Indian classical arts. It is the Foundation that organises the Kathakali Festival, the seventeenth edition of which was inaugurated at the Bharata Kalakshetra Auditorium in Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai.

The remaining options give years that the release does not associate with the Foundation at all. Candidates should pair the founding year with the founder's name, because questions on this institution almost always test the two together, and occasionally test the city as well. A useful way to hold it is as a single line: Kalakshetra Foundation, 1936, Rukmini Devi Arundale, Chennai, now functioning under the Ministry of Culture.