In which case did the Supreme Court reverse its earlier view and hold that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution?
- A.Berubari Union case (1960)
- B.Golaknath case (1967)
- C.LIC of India case (1995)
- D.Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)
Show answer
Correct answer: D. Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)
Explanation
The correct answer is the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973). In the Berubari Union case of 1960 the Supreme Court had said that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution, though it is a key to the minds of its makers. In Kesavananda Bharati the Court rejected that view and held that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution and can be amended, provided its basic features are not changed.
The Berubari Union case is the earlier decision that was reversed, so it cannot be the answer. The LIC of India case of 1995 came later and only reaffirmed that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution; it did not reverse anything. The Golaknath case of 1967 concerned Parliament's power to amend Fundamental Rights, not the status of the Preamble. The word "reverse" in the question is the clue: it points to the case that overturned Berubari, which is Kesavananda Bharati.