Skip to content
GK24
Indian PolityMediumAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2022, GK

Which one of the following statements about a Bill for Amendment of the Constitution of India is not correct ?

  1. A.It is governed by Article 368(2) of the Constitution of India.
  2. B.Joint sitting can be resorted to for passing a Bill amending the Constitution of India.
  3. C.The State Legislatures cannot initiate any Bill or proposal for amendment of the Constitution of India.
  4. D.The previous sanction of the President of India is not required for introducing any Bill in the Parliament for amendment of the Constitution of India.

Correct answer

B. Joint sitting can be resorted to for passing a Bill amending the Constitution of India.

Explanation

The correct answer is B, Joint sitting can be resorted to for passing a Bill amending the Constitution of India. This statement is incorrect because a Constitution Amendment Bill must be passed by each House of Parliament separately by the special majority, and Article 108 joint sittings do not apply to it. If the two Houses disagree, the Bill simply fails. Article 368(2) sets out the procedure: the Bill can be introduced only in Parliament, in either House, by a minister or a private member; each House must pass it by a majority of its total membership and two-thirds of members present and voting; certain amendments also need ratification by half the state legislatures; and the President must then give assent, as made binding by the 24th Amendment of 1971. Option A is wrong to pick because the procedure is indeed in Article 368(2). Option C is wrong to pick because state legislatures cannot start an amendment. Option D is wrong to pick because no prior sanction of the President is needed to introduce such a Bill. Exam tip: no joint sitting for Constitution Amendment Bills; joint sittings are for ordinary Bills only.

View all
Q1.Indian PolityAsked in: NDA · NDA-II 2024, GATMedium

Which of the following Committees does NOT consist of Members from the Upper House of the Parliament? 1. Public Accounts Committee 2. Estimates Committee 3. Committee on Public Undertakings Select the answer using the code given below:

  1. A.1 and 2
  2. B.1 and 3
  3. C.2 only
  4. D.3 only
Show answer
Correct answer: C. 2 only

The Estimates Committee is drawn entirely from the Lok Sabha, while the other two financial committees include members of the Rajya Sabha.

Q2.Indian PolityAsked in: NDA · NDA-II 2024, GATMedium

Consider the following statements : 1. The duties of the Attorney General of India are to give advice to the Government of India upon such legal matters, and to perform such other duties of a legal character, as may from time to time be referred to or assigned to him by the President of India 2. The Solicitor General of India is the secondary Law Officer of the country, who assists the Attorney General, and is himself assisted by several Additional Solicitor Generals of India Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. A.1 only
  2. B.2 only
  3. C.Both 1 and 2
  4. D.Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer
Correct answer: C. Both 1 and 2

Statement 1 restates Article 76, and statement 2 correctly describes the Solicitor General's place below the Attorney General. Article 76 of the Constitution creates the office of the Attorney General, the highest law officer of the Union.

Q5.Indian PolityAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2019, GKHard

Which one of the following is not correct about Administrative Tribunals?

  1. A.The Parliament may by law constitute Administrative Tribunals both at the Union and State levels.
  2. B.Tribunals may look into disputes and complaints with respect to recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services.
  3. C.Tribunals established by a law of the Parliament can exclude the jurisdiction of all Courts to allow for special leave to appeal.
  4. D.The law establishing the Tribunals may provide for procedures including rules of evidence to be followed.
Show answer
Correct answer: C. Tribunals established by a law of the Parliament can exclude the jurisdiction of all Courts to allow for special leave to appeal.

Article 323A, added by the 42nd Amendment in 1976, lets Parliament by law set up administrative tribunals for the Union and for each state or group of states to decide disputes on recruitment and service conditions of public servants.