Skip to content
GK24
HaryanaMedium

Which of the following was NOT a condition introduced for panchayat candidates by the Haryana amendment of 2015?

  1. A.A functional toilet at home
  2. B.No arrears of electricity dues or cooperative loans
  3. C.A minimum educational qualification
  4. D.Ownership of agricultural land in the village

Correct answer

D. Ownership of agricultural land in the village

Explanation

The correct answer is D, Ownership of agricultural land in the village. The amendment never made landholding a condition for contesting; such a requirement would have excluded landless villagers altogether and was not part of the law that the Supreme Court examined.

Option A was a condition: a candidate had to have a functional toilet at the house, a provision tied to the sanitation drive of those years. Option B was also a condition, since a candidate was not to be in arrears of electricity dues or of loans from a cooperative bank or a cooperative society, the idea being that a person seeking to handle public money should have cleared dues to public bodies. Option C was the best known condition, the minimum educational qualification of matriculation in general, with relaxation for women, Scheduled Caste candidates and Scheduled Caste women contesting as panch. All three were upheld in Rajbala versus State of Haryana, which is why the question is usually set in this negative form.

Read the full article: Panchayati Raj and Urban Local Bodies of Haryana: Acts and Articles

View all
Q1.HaryanaEasy

Panchayati raj in Haryana is governed today by which state law?

  1. A.The Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1952
  2. B.The Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994
  3. C.The Haryana Municipal Act, 1973
  4. D.The Haryana Panchayat Samiti Act, 1966
Show answer
Correct answer: B. The Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994

After the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1992 every state had to bring its own law in line with Part IX of the Constitution, and Haryana did so with the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, which still governs the gram panchayats, panchayat samitis and zila parishads of the state.

Q3.HaryanaMedium

The Supreme Court case Rajbala versus State of Haryana (2015) dealt with which subject?

  1. A.Reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes in municipalities
  2. B.Minimum qualifications prescribed for contesting panchayat elections
  3. C.Delay in holding panchayat elections
  4. D.Powers of the State Finance Commission
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Minimum qualifications prescribed for contesting panchayat elections

Haryana amended its Panchayati Raj Act in 2015 to add conditions for candidates, including a minimum educational qualification, no outstanding arrears of electricity dues or cooperative loans, and a functional toilet at home.

Q4.HaryanaMedium

Under the Haryana Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act, 2015, the minimum educational qualification fixed for a general category male candidate was:

  1. A.Class 5 pass
  2. B.Class 8 pass
  3. C.Matriculation
  4. D.Graduation
Show answer
Correct answer: C. Matriculation

The amendment required a general category candidate to have passed matriculation, that is Class 10, while a relaxation was given to women and to Scheduled Caste candidates, who needed Class 8, and to Scheduled Caste women contesting a panch seat, for whom Class 5 was enough.