Which of the following is/are the possible consequence/s of heavy sand mining in riverbeds? 1. Decreased salinity in the river 2. Pollution of groundwater 3. Lowering of the water-table Select the correct answer using the code given below :
- A.1 only
- B.2 and 3 only
- C.1 and 3 only
- D.1, 2 and 3
Correct answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B, 2 and 3 only. Heavy sand mining lowers the water table and exposes groundwater to pollution, but it does not reduce river salinity. Riverbed sand acts as a sponge and a filter: it stores water, recharges the aquifers along the river and cleans water as it seeps down. When large quantities are dug out, the riverbed is cut deeper, the river flows lower, and nearby wells and the water table drop. Removing the sand layer also takes away the natural filter, so pollutants and silt reach groundwater more easily, and in coastal stretches a deeper channel lets seawater push further upstream. That is why statement 1 is wrong: mining tends to increase, not decrease, salinity near river mouths. It also damages bridges and embankments and destroys habitat for fish and other river life. Option A is wrong because statement 1 is false. Option C is wrong because it includes statement 1 and leaves out statement 2. Option D is wrong because it includes statement 1. Exam tip: sand mining = lower water table, polluted groundwater, more saltwater intrusion; India regulates it under the Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines, 2016.
Practice Questions
View allThe Partnership for Action on Green Economy (PAGE), a UN mechanism to assist countries transition towards greener and more inclusive economies, emerged at
- A.The Earth Summit on Sustainable Development 2002, Johannesburg
- B.The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development 2012, Rio de Janeiro
- C.The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2015, Paris
- D.The World Sustainable Development Summit 2016, New Delhi
Show answer
PAGE was launched in 2013 as a direct response to the call made at the Rio+20 conference of June 2012, whose outcome document, 'The Future We Want', recognised the green economy as a tool for sustainable development and poverty eradication.
Read the full explanation →With reference to Indian laws about wildlife protection, consider the following statements : 1. Wild animals are the sole property of the government. 2. When a wild animal is declared protected, such animal is entitled for equal protection whether it is found in protected areas or outside. 3. Apprehension of a protected wild animal becoming a danger to human life is sufficient ground for its capture or killing. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 and 2
- B.2 only
- C.1 and 3
- D.3 only
Show answer
Under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, wild animals belong to the government and a protected animal is protected everywhere, but mere fear of danger does not justify killing it.
Read the full explanation →The term 'M-STrIPES' is sometimes seen in the news in the context of
- A.Captive breeding of Wild Fauna
- B.Maintenance of Tiger Reserves
- C.Indigenous Satellite Navigation System
- D.Security of National Highways
Show answer
M-STrIPES stands for Monitoring System for Tigers: Intensive Protection and Ecological Status. It was introduced by the National Tiger Conservation Authority around 2010, with technical support from the Wildlife Institute of India, for use in tiger reserves.
Read the full explanation →In India, 'extended producer responsibility' was introduced as an important feature in which of the following?
- A.The Bio-medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998
- B.The Recycled Plastic (Manufacturing and Usage) Rules, 1999
- C.The e-Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2011
- D.The Food Safety and Standard Regulations, 2011
Show answer
These rules, notified under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and in force from May 2012, made extended producer responsibility, or EPR, their central feature.
Read the full explanation →Which one of the following best describes the term "greenwashing" ?
- A.Conveying a false impression that a company's products are eco-friendly and environmentally sound
- B.Non-inclusion of ecological/ environmental costs in the Annual Financial Statements of a country
- C.Ignoring the disastrous ecological consequences while undertaking infrastructure development
- D.Making mandatory provisions for environmental costs in a government project/programme
Show answer
Greenwashing is misleading green marketing. The word joins "green" with "whitewashing", which means covering up faults.
Read the full explanation →