Under which law did the Maritime State Development Council become a statutory consultative body?
- A.The Major Port Authorities Act, 2021
- B.The Indian Ports Act, 2025
- C.The Merchant Shipping Act, 2024
- D.The Inland Vessels Act, 2021
Correct answer
Explanation
The correct answer is the Indian Ports Act, 2025. The Council was recognised as a statutory consultative body under this Act, which was notified on 15 May 2026, and the Mumbai session was the first one it held in that new character. The Council is not new in itself, as it was originally constituted in 1997, but the Act gave it a legal foundation and a wider mandate to promote integrated maritime growth, coordinated policy making and planned development of maritime infrastructure. States and Union Territories were directed by this meeting to notify subordinate rules under Section 77 of the same Act within three months. The other three options name laws that were not cited as the source of the Council's statutory status in this decision, so they are incorrect. Remember the pairing of the Council with the Indian Ports Act and with its notification date.
Read the full article: 21st Maritime State Development Council Meets in Mumbai
Practice Questions
In which city was the 21st Maritime State Development Council (MSDC) meeting held?
- A.Chennai
- B.Mumbai
- C.Kochi
- D.Visakhapatnam
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is Mumbai. The twenty-first meeting of the Maritime State Development Council was held in Mumbai, where delegates were also taken on study visits to the cruise terminal of the Mumbai Port Authority and to Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority before the session began. Union Minister for Ports, Shipping and Waterways Sarbananda Sonowal chaired the meeting, which was the first one held after the Council became a statutory consultative body under the Indian Ports Act, 2025. Chennai, Kochi and Visakhapatnam are wrong. Each of them does have a major port whose chairperson attended the meeting, because chairpersons of major ports such as Chennai, Cochin and Visakhapatnam were among the participants, but none of these cities hosted the session. Candidates should link the edition number, the host city and the chairperson together, since questions on councils of this kind usually ask for one of the three.
Which organisation developed the Shipbuilding Project Credit Risk Insurance Policy announced at the 21st MSDC meeting?
- A.The New India Assurance Company
- B.ECGC Ltd
- C.Life Insurance Corporation of India
- D.General Insurance Corporation of India
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is ECGC Ltd. Two credit risk insurance products for shipyards were announced at the meeting under the National Shipbuilding Mission, both framed under the Shipbuilding Development Scheme. The Shipbuilding Project Credit Risk Insurance Policy was developed by ECGC Ltd and covers export projects. Option A, The New India Assurance Company, is the insurer behind the other product, the Business Credit Shield Policy for Shipbuilders, which protects domestic projects, so it is a close but wrong choice here. Options C and D name insurers that had no role in these two policies. The government will subsidise the premium on both covers and will support the insurers if a shipyard files a claim, the aim being that a single delayed milestone payment does not stall a long shipbuilding project. Candidates should keep the export and domestic split clearly in mind.
By when are One Nation One Port Process reforms to be implemented at all ports, as decided by the 21st MSDC?
- A.March 2026
- B.December 2026
- C.March 2027
- D.March 2030
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is March 2027. The Council resolved that the One Nation One Port Process reforms, which include One Nation One Documentation, port process re-engineering and inter-ministerial process reforms, must be in place at every port by March 2027. It further decided that all ports must integrate with the Maritime Single Window, known as Sagar Setu, by the same date, so that documentation and clearances move through unified digital processes across the country. To help ports apply the change uniformly, the minister released a Ready Reckoner for implementing these reforms, which also gathers the relevant central circulars. The other options are wrong because no earlier or later deadline was set for this package of reforms. The vision targets adopted at the same meeting carry their own horizons, namely Maritime India Vision 2030 and Maritime Amrit Kaal Vision 2047, which should not be confused with this reform deadline.
Which body set up the National Culture Fund that is a party to this agreement?
- A.The Ministry of Culture
- B.The Archaeological Survey of India
- C.The Ministry of Tourism
- D.Hindustan Aeronautics Limited
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is the Ministry of Culture. The National Culture Fund was established by that ministry to make partnerships possible between the government and the corporate sector for conserving and promoting India's tangible and intangible cultural heritage, and this agreement is an example of that purpose at work. Option B is wrong because the Archaeological Survey of India is the agency that protects monuments and will supervise the work technically, not the body that created the Fund. Option C is wrong since the Ministry of Tourism has no role in this agreement. Option D is wrong because Hindustan Aeronautics Limited is the defence public sector company funding the projects from its corporate social responsibility budget. The Secretary of the Ministry of Culture, Vivek Aggarwal, was present when the agreement was signed in New Delhi.
At which of the three sites in the agreement is the work planned in the North Bazaar and South Bazaar areas?
- A.Taj Mahal
- B.Bekal Fort
- C.Hampi
- D.Kartavya Bhawan
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is Hampi, the site in Karnataka that stands on the UNESCO list of World Heritage Sites. The projects there take in the historic North Bazaar and South Bazaar areas, where development work is proposed over a stretch of about 270 metres in the first and about 250 metres in the second. At the Taj Mahal and at Bekal Fort the agreement provides for approved conservation and site development work settled in consultation with the Archaeological Survey of India, but no bazaar stretches are named for them, so options A and B are wrong. Option D is not a heritage site at all: Kartavya Bhawan-02 in New Delhi is the building where the agreement was signed, in the presence of the Secretary of the Ministry of Culture, Vivek Aggarwal. Keep the two lengths at Hampi in mind.