The Speaker of the Lok Sabha can be removed from office by a resolution of the House passed by which majority?
- A.A simple majority of members present and voting
- B.A majority of all the then members of the House
- C.A two-thirds majority of members present and voting
- D.A two-thirds majority of the total membership of the House
Correct answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B, a majority of all the then members of the House. Article 94(c) says the Speaker or Deputy Speaker may be removed from office by a resolution of the House of the People passed by a majority of all the then members of the House, and the proviso requires fourteen days notice of the intention to move such a resolution. This is the effective majority, counted on the strength of the House excluding vacancies, not on those merely present. Option A is wrong because a simple majority is what elects the Speaker under Article 93, not what removes the Speaker. Options C and D are wrong because a two-thirds majority is nowhere required for the Speaker; it belongs to other provisions, such as the removal of a judge or the impeachment of the President, and examiners place it here as a deliberate trap. Note also that Article 96 bars the Speaker from presiding while such a resolution is being considered.
Read the full article: Speaker and Parliamentary Committees: Articles and Membership
Practice Questions
View allUnder which Article of the Constitution does the Lok Sabha choose a Speaker and a Deputy Speaker from among its members?
- A.Article 89
- B.Article 93
- C.Article 97
- D.Article 100
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B, Article 93. Article 93 of the Constitution provides that the House of the People shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the House to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker, and that whenever either office becomes vacant the House shall choose another member to fill it. The election is held on a date fixed by the President and is decided by a simple majority of those present and voting. Option A is wrong because Article 89 is the matching provision for the Rajya Sabha, which deals with the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Council of States, and the Vice-President is the ex officio Chairman there. Option C is wrong because Article 97 only charges the salaries and allowances of these presiding officers on the Consolidated Fund of India. Option D is wrong because Article 100 covers voting in the Houses, the casting vote of the presiding officer and the quorum of one-tenth of the total membership.
What happens to the office of the Speaker when the Lok Sabha is dissolved?
- A.The Speaker vacates office on the day of dissolution
- B.The Speaker continues in office until immediately before the first meeting of the next Lok Sabha
- C.The President appoints a caretaker Speaker for the interval
- D.The Chairman of the Rajya Sabha takes over the duties of the Speaker
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B. The proviso to Article 94 states that the Speaker shall not vacate office on the dissolution of the House of the People but shall continue to hold it until immediately before the first meeting of the next Lok Sabha. The reason is practical: the office must survive so that someone can authenticate records, exercise the powers of the House in the interval and hand over an orderly House to the new Speaker. Option A is wrong precisely because of this proviso, which makes the Speaker an exception to the rule that the House and its members go with dissolution. Option C is wrong because the President appoints only a Speaker pro tem, and that is to swear in the members of the new House after it is constituted, not to fill a gap after dissolution. Option D is wrong because the Rajya Sabha is a permanent House that is never dissolved, and its Chairman has no role in Lok Sabha business except at a joint sitting in the Speaker absence.
The Speaker of the Lok Sabha exercises a vote in which situation?
- A.In the first instance on every question put to the House
- B.Only a casting vote when the votes are equally divided
- C.Only on Money Bills
- D.The Speaker never votes in the House under any circumstance
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B. Article 100(1) provides that the Speaker or the person acting as Speaker shall not vote in the first instance, but shall have and exercise a casting vote in the case of an equality of votes. The purpose is to keep the chair above party contest while still giving the House a way out of a deadlock. Option A is wrong because voting in the first instance on every question is what an ordinary member does, and the chair is deliberately denied that right. Option C is wrong because the Speaker role in Money Bills is a different one altogether: under Article 110(4) the Speaker certifies whether a Bill is a Money Bill, and that certificate is final and cannot be questioned in any court. Option D is wrong because the Speaker is a full member of the House and does vote in two situations, namely a casting vote under Article 100 and a first-instance vote on a resolution for the Speaker own removal under Article 96.
What is the total membership of the Public Accounts Committee of Parliament?
- A.15 members, all from the Lok Sabha
- B.22 members, 15 from the Lok Sabha and 7 from the Rajya Sabha
- C.30 members, all from the Lok Sabha
- D.31 members, 21 from the Lok Sabha and 10 from the Rajya Sabha
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B. The Public Accounts Committee has twenty-two members, fifteen elected by the Lok Sabha and seven by the Rajya Sabha, each by proportional representation through the single transferable vote, for a term of one year. Its chairperson is appointed by the Speaker from among its Lok Sabha members, and since 1967 the convention has been to appoint a member of the Opposition. The committee examines the appropriation accounts and the audit reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General. Option A is wrong because fifteen is only the Lok Sabha share of the committee, not its total strength. Option C is wrong because thirty, all drawn from the Lok Sabha, is the Estimates Committee, which has no Rajya Sabha representation at all. Option D is wrong because thirty-one, split twenty-one and ten, is the size of each Departmentally Related Standing Committee. The Committee on Public Undertakings, like the Public Accounts Committee, has twenty-two members.
The Estimates Committee of Parliament was constituted in 1950 on the recommendation of which person?
- A.John Mathai
- B.V. K. Krishna Menon
- C.G. V. Mavalankar
- D.C. D. Deshmukh
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is A, John Mathai. The Estimates Committee was set up in 1950 on the suggestion of John Mathai, who was then the Union Finance Minister, and it consists of thirty members, all elected from the Lok Sabha; the Rajya Sabha has no representation on it. Its chairperson is appointed by the Speaker, a minister cannot be a member, and its function is to examine the Budget estimates, suggest economies and propose alternative forms of presenting the estimates, which is why it is called the continuous economy committee. Option B is wrong because the Krishna Menon Committee recommended the Committee on Public Undertakings, which was constituted in 1964. Option C is wrong because G. V. Mavalankar was the first Speaker of the Lok Sabha and is called the Father of the Lok Sabha, but the Estimates Committee is not named to his recommendation. Option D is wrong because C. D. Deshmukh, though a Finance Minister and earlier a Governor of the Reserve Bank, is not associated with the creation of this committee.