Skip to content
GK24
Indian EconomyMediumAsked in: CDS · CDS-II 2018, GK

The natural rate of unemployment hypothesis was advocated by

  1. A.Milton Friedman
  2. B.A. W. Phillips
  3. C.J. M. Keynes
  4. D.R. G. Lipsey

Correct answer

A. Milton Friedman

Explanation

The correct answer is A, Milton Friedman. Milton Friedman put forward the natural rate of unemployment in his presidential address to the American Economic Association in 1967, published in 1968; Edmund Phelps reached a similar idea independently. The natural rate is the unemployment that remains when the labour market is in balance, made up of frictional and structural unemployment. Friedman argued that policy can push unemployment below this rate only for a short time, by surprising people with inflation; once expectations adjust, unemployment returns to the natural rate while inflation stays higher. So in the long run the Phillips curve is vertical. Option B is wrong because A. W. Phillips described, in 1958, the inverse link between unemployment and wage inflation that Friedman challenged. Option C is wrong because J. M. Keynes stressed involuntary unemployment caused by weak demand. Option D is wrong because R. G. Lipsey gave a theoretical basis for the Phillips curve. Exam tip: natural rate and vertical long-run Phillips curve, Friedman and Phelps.

View all
Q2.Indian EconomyAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2018, GKHard

Consider the following statements about impact of tax : 1. A tax is shifted forward to consumers if the demand is inelastic relative to supply. 2. A tax is shifted backward to producers if the supply is relatively more inelastic than demand. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. A.1 only
  2. B.2 only
  3. C.Both 1 and 2
  4. D.Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer
Correct answer: C. Both 1 and 2

The burden of a tax falls more heavily on whichever side of the market is less elastic, the side that cannot easily walk away.

Q5.Indian EconomyAsked in: CDS · CDS-II 2017, GKHard

Why was constitutional amendment needed for introducing GST?

  1. A.States were not willing to agree with the Union for introduction of GST without amendment in the Constitution.
  2. B.GST was to be implemented on concurrent base and Article 246 was inadequate for such a case.
  3. C.The Empowered Committee of Finance Ministers had recommended for constitutional amendment.
  4. D.The GST Council had recommended for constitutional amendment so that its power enhances.
Show answer
Correct answer: B. GST was to be implemented on concurrent base and Article 246 was inadequate for such a case.

GST is levied by the Union and the States together on the same supply, and Article 246, which splits taxing powers between them through separate lists, did not allow such a concurrent tax.