Skip to content
GK24
Indian EconomyEasyAsked in: SSC CHSL · 04 Jul, 2024, Shift 3

In which year was the 'Aatmanirbhar Bharat Rojgar Yojana' launched by the Government of India?

  1. A.2010
  2. B.2015
  3. C.2020
  4. D.2022

Correct answer

C. 2020

Explanation

The correct answer is C, 2020. The Aatmanirbhar Bharat Rojgar Yojana was announced in October 2020 as part of the Aatmanirbhar Bharat package, to bring back the jobs lost during the Covid-19 lockdown. Under it the central government paid the provident fund contribution for new employees taken on by establishments registered with the EPFO: in units with up to 1,000 workers it paid both the employee's twelve per cent and the employer's twelve per cent, and in larger units only the employee's share, for two years from the date of joining. The benefit covered workers drawing less than fifteen thousand rupees a month who were newly hired or had lost a job earlier that year. A is wrong because 2010 belongs to an earlier period of schemes. B is wrong because 2015 is the year of the Atal Pension Yojana. D is wrong because by 2022 registration under this scheme had already closed. Exam tip: ABRY, 2020, an EPFO-linked wage subsidy for new jobs after Covid.

View all
Q2.Indian EconomyAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2018, GKHard

Consider the following statements about impact of tax : 1. A tax is shifted forward to consumers if the demand is inelastic relative to supply. 2. A tax is shifted backward to producers if the supply is relatively more inelastic than demand. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. A.1 only
  2. B.2 only
  3. C.Both 1 and 2
  4. D.Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer
Correct answer: C. Both 1 and 2

The burden of a tax falls more heavily on whichever side of the market is less elastic, the side that cannot easily walk away.

Q5.Indian EconomyAsked in: CDS · CDS-II 2017, GKHard

Why was constitutional amendment needed for introducing GST?

  1. A.States were not willing to agree with the Union for introduction of GST without amendment in the Constitution.
  2. B.GST was to be implemented on concurrent base and Article 246 was inadequate for such a case.
  3. C.The Empowered Committee of Finance Ministers had recommended for constitutional amendment.
  4. D.The GST Council had recommended for constitutional amendment so that its power enhances.
Show answer
Correct answer: B. GST was to be implemented on concurrent base and Article 246 was inadequate for such a case.

GST is levied by the Union and the States together on the same supply, and Article 246, which splits taxing powers between them through separate lists, did not allow such a concurrent tax.