Skip to content
GK24
Indian EconomyEasyAsked in: SSC CPO · 9 Nov 2022, Shift 2

In which Five-Year Plan was advocated planning shifted from agriculture to industries?

  1. A.Third
  2. B.Fourth
  3. C.Second
  4. D.Fifth

Correct answer

C. Second

Explanation

The correct answer is C, Second. The Second Five-Year Plan, 1956 to 1961, moved the focus from farming to rapid industrialisation, especially heavy and basic industries. It was built on the Mahalanobis model, drawn up by the statistician P. C. Mahalanobis, which argued that investing in machine-making and steel would give faster long-run growth. Three public-sector steel plants came up in this plan: Bhilai with Soviet help, Rourkela with West German help and Durgapur with British help. The First Plan, 1951 to 1956, had put agriculture, irrigation and power first, on the Harrod-Domar model. A is wrong because the Third Plan, 1961 to 1966, aimed at a self-reliant, self-generating economy and was hit by the wars of 1962 and 1965. B is wrong because the Fourth Plan, 1969 to 1974, aimed at growth with stability and progressive achievement of self-reliance. D is wrong because the Fifth Plan, 1974 to 1979, made removal of poverty its main goal. Exam tip: First plan farms, Second plan factories on the Mahalanobis model, Fifth plan Garibi Hatao.

View all
Q2.Indian EconomyAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2018, GKHard

Consider the following statements about impact of tax : 1. A tax is shifted forward to consumers if the demand is inelastic relative to supply. 2. A tax is shifted backward to producers if the supply is relatively more inelastic than demand. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. A.1 only
  2. B.2 only
  3. C.Both 1 and 2
  4. D.Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer
Correct answer: C. Both 1 and 2

The burden of a tax falls more heavily on whichever side of the market is less elastic, the side that cannot easily walk away.

Q5.Indian EconomyAsked in: CDS · CDS-II 2017, GKHard

Why was constitutional amendment needed for introducing GST?

  1. A.States were not willing to agree with the Union for introduction of GST without amendment in the Constitution.
  2. B.GST was to be implemented on concurrent base and Article 246 was inadequate for such a case.
  3. C.The Empowered Committee of Finance Ministers had recommended for constitutional amendment.
  4. D.The GST Council had recommended for constitutional amendment so that its power enhances.
Show answer
Correct answer: B. GST was to be implemented on concurrent base and Article 246 was inadequate for such a case.

GST is levied by the Union and the States together on the same supply, and Article 246, which splits taxing powers between them through separate lists, did not allow such a concurrent tax.