Habitat rights under the Forest Rights Act have so far been recognised for how many of the country’s Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups?
- A.75 of 75
- B.11 of 75
- C.20 of 75
- D.11 of 20
Correct answer
Explanation
The correct answer is 11 of 75. The Ministry of Tribal Affairs noted that habitat rights have been recognised for only this small number out of all the Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups in the country, and for that reason it urged the States to expedite recognition and to build a habitat rights roadmap for each group. Option A is wrong because it would mean the task is complete, which is the opposite of what the review found. Option C substitutes a number that belongs elsewhere in the same report, the count of districts in the host Union Territory where District Level Committees have been set up. Option D keeps the right numerator but replaces the total, and the total number of such groups in the country is the figure the question turns on. Recognition of habitat rights is distinct from individual and community forest rights.
Read the full article: Third Regional FRA Review Conference Held in Srinagar
Practice Questions
The Third Regional Review Conference on the implementation of the Forest Rights Act was held in which city?
- A.Bengaluru
- B.Kolkata
- C.Srinagar
- D.New Delhi
Show answer
The Ministry of Tribal Affairs convened the third and concluding conference of the regional review series in Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, where senior officials of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Goa, Rajasthan and the host Union Territory reviewed progress under the Act.
Read the full explanation →As of 31 August 2026, what share of the Forest Rights Act claims received in the country had been disposed of?
- A.80.64 per cent
- B.54 per cent
- C.43.56 per cent
- D.25.42 per cent
Show answer
The Ministry reported that about 54 lakh claims had been received across the country and that 43.56 lakh of them, which is this share, had been disposed of by that date.
Read the full explanation →Under which law was the regional review series on forest rights conducted?
- A.The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
- B.The Indian Forest Act, 1927
- C.The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
- D.The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
Show answer
The review covered claims received and disposed of under this law, the titles distributed, Community Forest Resource Rights and habitat rights for Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups, all of which flow from this statute.
Read the full explanation →Within what period must the committee on pharmaceutical marketing practices submit its recommendations?
- A.Two months from the date of its first meeting
- B.Six months from the date of its constitution
- C.One year from the date of its first meeting
- D.Three months from the date of its constitution
Show answer
The order constituting the committee sets that period and also requires the panel to complete the consultative process it has been asked to undertake before submitting its recommendations.
Read the full explanation →The Uniform Code for Pharmaceutical Marketing Practices (UCPMP) was first introduced in which year?
- A.2015
- B.2024
- C.2019
- D.2026
Show answer
The code was introduced in that year as a voluntary, industry-led self-regulatory mechanism meant to promote ethical pharmaceutical marketing and to regulate the interactions between pharmaceutical companies and healthcare professionals.
Read the full explanation →