Consider the following statements : 1. It is the Governor of the State who recognizes and declares any community of that State as a Scheduled Tribe. 2. A community declared as a Scheduled Tribe in a State need not be so in another State. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 only
- B.2 only
- C.Both 1 and 2
- D.Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B, 2 only. The President, not the Governor, specifies Scheduled Tribes, and the list is made state by state.
Article 342(1) of the Constitution lets the President, after consulting the Governor of a state, specify by public notification the tribes or tribal communities that are to be Scheduled Tribes in relation to that state or Union Territory. Once the list is notified, only Parliament can add a community to it or remove one, by law under Article 342(2); the President cannot change it by a fresh notification. Because the lists are drawn up for each state separately, a community such as the Gonds or the Bhils may be a Scheduled Tribe in one state and not in a neighbouring one, and a person's tribal status is tied to the state of origin.
A is wrong because the Governor is only consulted. C is wrong because statement 1 is false. D is wrong because statement 2 is true.
Exam tip: Article 342: President notifies the ST list after consulting the Governor; Parliament alone amends it.
Practice Questions
View allWhich one of the following statements with regard to the functioning of the Panchayats is not correct?
- A.Panchayats may levy, collect and appropriate taxes, duties, tolls, etc.
- B.A person who has attained the age of 25 years will be eligible to be a member of a Panchayat.
- C.Every Panchayat shall ordinarily continue for five years from the date of its first meeting.
- D.A Panchayat reconstituted after premature dissolution shall continue only for the remainder of the full period.
Show answer
Under Article 243F, the minimum age to become a member of a Panchayat is 21 years, not 25. Part IX of the Constitution, added by the 73rd Amendment Act, 1992 and in force from 24 April 1993, lays down the framework of Panchayati Raj.
Read the full explanation →As per Article 371G of the Constitution of India, special provisions have been made with respect to the state of Mizoram. Accordingly, no Act of Parliament shall apply on certain matters unless the Legislative Assembly of Mizoram so decides by a resolution. Which one of the following matters is not covered under this Article ?
- A.Religious or social practices of the Mizos
- B.Mizo customary law and procedure
- C.Administration of civil and criminal justice involving decisions according to Mizo customary law
- D.Ownership and transfer of natural resources
Show answer
Article 371G protects the ownership and transfer of land in Mizoram, not of natural resources in general. Article 371G was added by the 53rd Amendment Act, 1986, when Mizoram became a state after the Mizo Peace Accord.
Read the full explanation →Which one of the following indexes is used to assess the state of governance across the States and UTs ?
- A.Sustainable Governance Index
- B.E-Governance Index
- C.Urban Governance Index
- D.Good Governance Index
Show answer
The Good Governance Index (GGI) was designed by the Government of India to compare governance across States and Union Territories.
Read the full explanation →Which one of the following is not an Indian form of Socialism ?
- A.Democratic Socialism
- B.Radical Socialism
- C.Communitarian Socialism
- D.Nehruvian Socialism
Show answer
Radical socialism is a European political tradition, chiefly French, and is not one of the strands of socialism that grew in India.
Read the full explanation →Which one of the following organizations challenged the constitutionality of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code in the Supreme Court of India?
- A.Naz Foundation (India) Trust
- B.Bachpan Bachao Andolan
- C.Sambhav Foundation India
- D.ActionAid India
Show answer
This Delhi-based NGO, working on HIV/AIDS, led the long legal fight against Section 377 of the IPC. Section 377 punished "carnal intercourse against the order of nature" and was used against consensual same-sex relations.
Read the full explanation →