Skip to content
GK24

CAQM Team Reviews Stubble Management in Firozpur, Faridkot

A CAQM team led by Dr T. S. Panwar reviewed paddy stubble management in Firozpur and Faridkot districts of Punjab and visited hotspot villages.

By Published · 2 min read
CAQM Team Reviews Stubble Management in Firozpur, Faridkot

Why in News

On 17 October 2026 the Commission for Air Quality Management said a high level team led by Dr T. S. Panwar had reviewed paddy stubble management in Firozpur and Faridkot districts of Punjab and visited hotspot villages there.

A high level team of the Commission for Air Quality Management in NCR and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) went to the Firozpur and Faridkot districts of Punjab to see for itself how measures against paddy stubble burning are working on the ground during the harvesting season. The team was led by Dr T. S. Panwar, Member (Technical) of the Commission, and the visit followed an earlier trip to Moga district.

The review meeting

A joint meeting was held at the office of the Deputy Commissioner in Firozpur with the Deputy Commissioners and the district officers of both districts. The team went through the readiness of the two district administrations and the way departments are coordinating for in situ and ex situ handling of paddy straw. Availability and deployment of Crop Residue Management (CRM) machinery, surveillance in the fields, watch over hotspot areas and enforcement action were all examined.

What the Commission asked for

  • Strengthen both in situ and ex situ management of paddy straw.
  • Make CRM machines reach farmers in time and see that they are used fully.
  • Improve coordination among farmers, aggregators, industry and other stakeholders.
  • Use drones and low cost sensors for technology based monitoring and trend analysis.
  • Tell farmers plainly about the harm caused by stubble burning and by fine particulate matter.

Visit to hotspot villages

After the meeting the team travelled to selected hotspot villages in both districts to judge the situation on the ground and to check whether the announced steps are actually being carried out. Hotspot villages are those that have repeatedly reported a large number of farm fires, so they receive closer attention.

Why this matters

Burning of paddy straw after the harvest is one of the sources that push up pollution in the capital region every autumn. In situ management means mixing the straw back into the soil with machines, while ex situ management means lifting it away for use as fuel or raw material. The Commission is a statutory body for air quality in the National Capital Region and the areas around it, and its field visits to hotspot districts of Punjab are part of a continuing exercise to prevent farm fires rather than only to punish them.

Important Facts

BodyCommission for Air Quality Management in NCR and Adjoining Areas (CAQM)
Team led byDr T. S. Panwar, Member (Technical), CAQM
Districts visitedFirozpur and Faridkot, Punjab
Earlier visitMoga district, Punjab
Meeting venueOffice of the Deputy Commissioner, Firozpur
MachineryCrop Residue Management (CRM) machinery
Technology for monitoringDrones and low cost sensors
Pollutant highlightedPM2.5

Exam Point of View

Remember the body (CAQM in NCR and Adjoining Areas), the official who led the team (Dr T. S. Panwar, Member Technical), the districts visited (Firozpur and Faridkot, after Moga), the machinery discussed (Crop Residue Management or CRM), the technology named (drones and low cost sensors), the pollutant named (PM2.5) and the difference between in situ and ex situ management of paddy straw.

Practice Questions

Q1.EnvironmentMedium

Which officer led the CAQM team that reviewed paddy stubble management in Firozpur and Faridkot?

  1. A.Dr T. S. Panwar, Member (Technical)
  2. B.The Chairperson of CAQM
  3. C.The Deputy Commissioner of Moga
  4. D.The Chief Secretary of Punjab
Show answer
Correct answer: A. Dr T. S. Panwar, Member (Technical)

He headed the high level team that went to the two districts of Punjab to examine how the measures against paddy stubble burning are being carried out during the harvesting season.

Q2.EnvironmentEasy

CRM machinery, discussed during the review, stands for which of the following?

  1. A.Crop Rotation Management machinery
  2. B.Crop Residue Management machinery
  3. C.Climate Risk Mitigation machinery
  4. D.Central Rural Mechanisation machinery
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Crop Residue Management machinery

These are the machines that handle paddy straw left in the field after the harvest, and the Commission reviewed both their availability and their actual deployment in the two districts.

Q3.EnvironmentMedium

Which two technologies did the CAQM review highlight for monitoring stubble burning?

  1. A.Satellites and ground radar
  2. B.Drones and low cost sensors
  3. C.Weather balloons and lidar
  4. D.Mobile laboratories and smog towers
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Drones and low cost sensors

The review covered their deployment for technology based monitoring and for analysing trends in farm fires, in addition to field level surveillance by officials and a close watch over the hotspot areas.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the CAQM team that visited Firozpur and Faridkot?

Dr T. S. Panwar, Member (Technical) of the Commission for Air Quality Management in NCR and Adjoining Areas. The team had visited Moga district of Punjab before going to these two districts.

What is the difference between in situ and ex situ management of paddy straw?

In situ management handles the straw in the field itself, with Crop Residue Management machinery mixing it into the soil. Ex situ management takes the straw away for use elsewhere, which needs coordination with aggregators and industry.

Which technologies did the Commission want used for monitoring?

Drones and low cost sensors, for technology based monitoring and trend analysis of stubble burning, along with field level surveillance and watch over hotspot areas.

Sources

Useful for:SSCSSC CGLIBPS