PRASHAST Inclusion Module Screened in 60,000 Schools

The correct answer is screening school children for probable disability conditions. PRASHAST is a school-based digital tool under the Department of School Education and Literacy that helps identify children with conditions covered by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, and it works through a checklist in two parts, with the teacher screening on observable indicators and a special educator validating the case and arranging a medical referral where required. Option B is wrong; midday meal records are maintained through a separate system under the school nutrition programme. Option C is wrong because the tool looks at children's needs rather than at teacher performance, although teachers are the ones who use it. Option D is wrong, as scholarship distribution runs through dedicated portals of other departments. The point to carry into an examination is the link between PRASHAST and the disability rights law.

The correct answer is more than 60,000 schools, with participation expected to grow further during the month. The other options are wrong because they alter the figure, and a candidate should keep this number apart from the second reach figure in the same news, namely the more than seventy-two lakh teachers already sensitised through the dedicated module over the preceding three months. The two numbers measure different things: one counts institutions that screened the film on a single day, the other counts individual teachers covered by a continuing exercise. It is also worth remembering that the module itself runs for thirty minutes, is offered in twelve Indian languages, and is aimed not only at teachers but at every adult a child encounters in school, from the head of the institution to drivers and clerical staff.

The correct answer is the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The conditions listed in that law define the scope of the PRASHAST checklist, which is how a classroom observation becomes a formal referral for assessment. Option A, the Right to Education Act, is wrong for this question even though it governs free and compulsory elementary schooling and is the usual first guess in a school-related question. Option C, the Juvenile Justice Act, is wrong because it deals with children in need of care and protection and children in conflict with law, not with disability screening in schools. Option D, the Mental Healthcare Act, is wrong as well; it concerns mental health care and rights of persons with mental illness rather than school-level identification. The department ties this work to the National Education Policy and to the disability law together.