Who chaired the video-conference meeting with Vice Chancellors of the National Law Universities?
- A.The Chief Justice of India
- B.Arjun Ram Meghwal
- C.The Attorney General of India
- D.The Secretary, Department of Justice
Correct answer
Explanation
The correct answer is Arjun Ram Meghwal, Union Minister of State with Independent Charge for Law and Justice, who both guided the mission and chaired the meeting held through video conferencing. The Chief Justice of India is wrong because this was an executive initiative of the Ministry of Law and Justice and not a judicial conference. The Attorney General of India is wrong because the law officer's role is to advise and represent the government in court, not to convene such meetings. The Secretary of the Department of Justice is wrong because, although the Secretary attended in person, the chair was taken by the minister. Also present were the Director General (Awards), the Director General of the Bureau of Police Research and Development and the Director General of the National Crime Records Bureau.
Read the full article: Law Ministry Mission on Pendency in 100 Hotspot Districts
Practice Questions
How many judicial districts has the Ministry of Law and Justice targeted under its new research-based mission on pendency?
- A.Top 50 districts
- B.Top 75 districts
- C.Top 100 districts
- D.Top 150 districts
Show answer
The ministry decided against a uniform nationwide drive and instead identified the judicial districts where the number of pending cases is largest, settling on one hundred of them.
Read the full explanation →Approximately how many cases are pending across courts in India, according to the Law Ministry?
- A.Over 2.8 crore
- B.Over 4.5 crore
- C.Over 5.8 crore
- D.Over 7.2 crore
Show answer
The ministry stated that this many matters are awaiting decision in courts across the country and that the majority of them lie in the district and subordinate judiciary rather than in the constitutional courts.
Read the full explanation →Vice Chancellors of how many National Law Universities, and from how many states, joined the meeting?
- A.Sixteen universities from nineteen states
- B.Nineteen universities from sixteen states
- C.Twenty-one universities from eighteen states
- D.Twenty-five universities from twenty states
Show answer
The meeting was convened with the Vice Chancellors of nineteen National Law Universities spread across sixteen states, and all of them assured the ministry of active participation in the pendency mission.
Read the full explanation →Who can submit inputs on the new demography portal?
- A.Only Central Ministries and Departments
- B.Only State and Union Territory Governments
- C.Central Ministries, State and UT Governments, NGOs and institutions, and individuals
- D.Only members of the committee and its research staff
Show answer
The portal is fully operational and open for public access, stakeholder submissions and data interaction, which is why options A, B and D, each of which narrows the list, are wrong.
Read the full explanation →Which ministry constituted the High-Level Committee on Demographic Changes?
- A.Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation
- B.Ministry of Home Affairs
- C.Ministry of External Affairs
- D.Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment
Show answer
The portal address itself carries the clue, since it sits on the ministry’s own domain.
Read the full explanation →