Which of the following commissions recommended that the appointment of Governor should be non-partisan?
- A.Fazal Ali Commission
- B.Rajmannar commission
- C.Sarkaria commission
- D.Mandal commission
Correct answer
C. Sarkaria commission
Explanation
The correct answer is C, Sarkaria commission. The Sarkaria Commission said the Governor should be a detached figure chosen without regard to party, and ideally someone who has not taken an active part in politics in the recent past or belonged to the ruling party at the centre. It was set up in 1983 under Justice R S Sarkaria to review centre-state relations and reported in 1988. It also advised that the Chief Minister of the state be consulted before a Governor is appointed, that Article 356 be used only as a last resort, and that the Inter-State Council be set up, which was done in 1990. A is wrong because the Fazal Ali Commission of 1953 was the States Reorganisation Commission on state boundaries. B is wrong because the Rajamannar Committee of 1969 was appointed by Tamil Nadu, not by the Union. D is wrong because the Mandal Commission of 1979 dealt with reservation for backward classes. Exam tip: tie the names - Sarkaria 1983 for centre-state relations, Punchhi 2007 for the same subject later.
Practice Questions
View allThe Constitution of India is a sovereign socialist secular democratic republic with a _________ system of government.
- A.unitary
- B.parliamentary
- C.monarchical
- D.presidential
Show answer
Correct answer: B. parliamentary
Explanation
The correct answer is B, parliamentary. India follows the parliamentary system, taken from Britain, in which the real executive is responsible to the legislature. The President is the nominal head of state, while the Council of Ministers led by the Prime Minister exercises real power and stays in office only while it holds the confidence of the Lok Sabha. Ministers are drawn from Parliament, the government falls if a no-confidence motion is passed, and the Prime Minister can advise the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. A is wrong because the Constitution is federal in structure with unitary features, which describes the division of powers between the centre and the states, not the form of government. C is wrong because India is a republic, so the head of state is elected and not a hereditary monarch. D is wrong because in a presidential system the executive is separate from and not answerable to the legislature, as in the United States. Exam tip: separate the two ideas - federal with a unitary bias describes the structure, parliamentary describes the government.
The Directive Principles of State Policy in the Constitution of India were borrowed from the _________ Constitution.
- A.Norwegian
- B.Australian
- C.Spanish
- D.Irish
Show answer
Correct answer: D. Irish
Explanation
The correct answer is D, Irish. The Directive Principles of State Policy, in Part IV of the Constitution from Articles 36 to 51, were taken from the Constitution of Ireland, which had in turn drawn the idea from Spain. They set out goals for the state in making law and policy, such as equal pay for equal work, a living wage, free and compulsory education for children, village panchayats and the protection of monuments. They are not enforceable in a court, which is how they differ from the Fundamental Rights, but Article 37 calls them fundamental in the governance of the country. A is wrong because the idea of a single citizenship came from Britain, not Norway, which lent nothing of note. B is wrong because Australia gave the concurrent list, freedom of trade and commerce and the joint sitting. C is wrong because Spain is only the earlier source for Ireland, not the direct one for India. Exam tip: remember the chain - the Directive Principles reached India from Ireland, and the method of electing the President also comes from there.
Who among the following presidents of India gave assent to the 100th Amendment of the Constitution of India?
- A.Ram Nath Kovind
- B.Pratibha Devisingh Patil
- C.APJ Abdul Kalam
- D.Pranab Mukherjee
Show answer
Correct answer: D. Pranab Mukherjee
Explanation
The correct answer is D, Pranab Mukherjee. The Constitution (100th Amendment) Act was passed in 2015 and received the President's assent on 31 May 2015, when Pranab Mukherjee held the office; he was President from 2012 to 2017. The amendment gave effect to the Land Boundary Agreement with Bangladesh, under which the two countries exchanged enclaves and adverse possessions, and it altered the First Schedule entries for Assam, West Bengal, Meghalaya and Tripura. People living in the transferred enclaves were allowed to choose their citizenship. Option A is wrong because Ram Nath Kovind became President only in 2017, two years later. Option B is wrong because Pratibha Patil's term ran from 2007 to 2012, before this amendment. Option C is wrong because A. P. J. Abdul Kalam was President from 2002 to 2007. Exam tip: the 100th Amendment of 2015 settled the India-Bangladesh land boundary and changed the First Schedule.
From which date does the rule apply that a person born in India is a citizen by birth only if at least one parent is an Indian citizen?
- A.26 January 1950
- B.1 July 1987
- C.3 December 2004
- D.31 December 2014
Show answer
Correct answer: B. 1 July 1987
Explanation
The correct answer is B, 1 July 1987. The amendment of 1986 changed the rule of citizenship by birth with effect from 1 July 1987: a person born in India on or after that date is a citizen by birth only if one of the parents was an Indian citizen at the time of the birth. Option A is wrong because for births from 26 January 1950 to 30 June 1987 the place of birth alone was enough and the nationality of the parents was irrelevant. Option C is wrong because 3 December 2004 marks the next and stricter stage, under which a person born in India is a citizen only if both parents are citizens, or one is a citizen and the other is not an illegal migrant. Option D is wrong because 31 December 2014 is the cut-off date of entry under the amendment of 2019 and has nothing to do with citizenship by birth.
The idea of single citizenship in the Indian Constitution has been borrowed from the Constitution of which country?
- A.United States of America
- B.Britain
- C.Canada
- D.Ireland
Show answer
Correct answer: B. Britain
Explanation
The correct answer is B, Britain. India follows the British practice of single citizenship: there is only citizenship of India and no separate citizenship of a state, so every citizen carries the same rights in every part of the country. From Britain India also took parliamentary government, the rule of law, single citizenship, the legislative procedure and the office of the Speaker. Option A is wrong because the United States has double citizenship, of the federation and of the state, along with fundamental rights, judicial review and the impeachment procedure that India did borrow. Option C is wrong because from Canada India took a federation with a strong centre, residuary powers with the Union and the appointment of state Governors. Option D is wrong because from Ireland India took the Directive Principles, the nomination of members to the Rajya Sabha and the method of electing the President.