The regulatory framework that created the NBFC-MFI as a separate category followed the report of which committee?
- A.Narasimham Committee
- B.Malegam Committee
- C.Nachiket Mor Committee
- D.Raghuram Rajan Committee
Correct answer
B. Malegam Committee
Explanation
The correct answer is B, the Malegam Committee. After the microfinance crisis in Andhra Pradesh in 2010, the Reserve Bank appointed a sub-committee of its central board under Y. H. Malegam to study the lending practices of microfinance institutions, and its report of January 2011 led to the NBFC-MFI being carved out as a distinct category with its own rules on margins, interest and recovery. Option A, the Narasimham Committee, reported on banking sector reform in 1991 and 1998 and has nothing to do with microfinance. Option C, the Nachiket Mor Committee of 2013, proposed comprehensive financial services for small businesses and low-income households and led towards small finance banks and payments banks, so it is a genuine distractor. Option D, the Raghuram Rajan Committee of 2008, reported on financial sector reforms more broadly.
Read the full article: NBFCs and Microfinance Institutions: Rules and Types
Practice Questions
View allUnder which section of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 is registration compulsory for a non-banking financial company?
- A.Section 42
- B.Section 45-IA
- C.Section 22
- D.Section 35A
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B, section 45-IA. The section was inserted by the Reserve Bank of India (Amendment) Act of 1997 and requires an NBFC to hold a certificate of registration from the Reserve Bank and to maintain the prescribed minimum net owned fund before it can carry on business. Option A, section 42, deals with the cash reserve ratio that a scheduled bank must keep with the Reserve Bank, so it belongs to banks and not to NBFCs. Option C, section 22, is the licensing provision for banking companies, but it sits in the Banking Regulation Act of 1949 rather than in the Reserve Bank of India Act. Option D, section 35A, is the Reserve Bank's general power to issue directions to banking companies. The companion provision worth remembering is section 45-IB, which requires a deposit-taking NBFC to keep liquid assets.
Which of the following is a non-banking financial company NOT permitted to do?
- A.Give loans and advances
- B.Accept demand deposits
- C.Acquire shares and debentures
- D.Carry on hire purchase business
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is B, accept demand deposits. An NBFC cannot accept demand deposits, cannot issue cheques drawn on itself, is not part of the payment and settlement system, and its depositors do not have the cover of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation. Those four points together are the difference between an NBFC and a bank. Option A is wrong as a choice because lending is the core activity of an NBFC and is written into its very definition. Option C is wrong for the same reason, since the acquisition of shares, debentures and other securities is one of the activities that defines the business. Option D is wrong because hire purchase is specifically named among the permitted activities, along with leasing, insurance business and chit business. A deposit-taking NBFC may accept term deposits, which is what makes this question worth reading twice.
Under the principal business criteria applied by the Reserve Bank, a company is treated as an NBFC when
- A.financial assets exceed 50 per cent of total assets and income from them exceeds 50 per cent of gross income
- B.financial assets exceed 25 per cent of total assets only
- C.income from financial assets exceeds 75 per cent of gross income only
- D.it is registered under the Companies Act and has any financial asset
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is A. The Reserve Bank uses what the industry calls the fifty-fifty test: both conditions must hold, so financial assets must be more than half of total assets and the income from those assets must be more than half of gross income. A company that meets only one of the two is not an NBFC. Option B is wrong because twenty-five per cent is not the threshold in either limb of the test. Option C is wrong on two counts: the figure is fifty and not seventy-five, and the income limb alone is never enough. Option D is wrong because incorporation under the Companies Act is a precondition for every company and says nothing about principal business; a manufacturer that parks money in securities is not an NBFC. The reason for the test is to separate a finance company from a trading, manufacturing or service company that also holds investments.
The Scale Based Regulation framework for NBFCs, in force since 1 October 2022, arranges them into how many layers?
- A.Two
- B.Three
- C.Four
- D.Five
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is C, four. The layers are the Base Layer, the Middle Layer, the Upper Layer and the Top Layer, and the regulation becomes stricter as a company moves up, so that supervision matches the risk a company poses to the system. Option A, two, reflects the older division into deposit-taking and non-deposit-taking companies, which still exists but is not the layered framework. Option B, three, is the usual wrong answer, because candidates remember the base, middle and upper layers and forget the fourth. Option D, five, is simply wrong. The detail that completes the answer is that the Top Layer is kept empty by design and will be populated only if the Reserve Bank judges that a company in the Upper Layer has come to pose a substantial increase in systemic risk.
A non-deposit-taking NBFC is treated as systemically important when its asset size is
- A.100 crore rupees and above
- B.250 crore rupees and above
- C.500 crore rupees and above
- D.1,000 crore rupees and above
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is C, five hundred crore rupees and above. A non-deposit-taking NBFC of that size is classified as systemically important, written as NBFC-ND-SI, and becomes subject to prudential norms on capital adequacy, exposure and disclosure that smaller companies escape. Option A, one hundred crore, was never the threshold. Option B, two hundred and fifty crore, is an invented figure placed between the real ones. Option D, one thousand crore, is the strongest distractor because it is a real threshold in this topic, but a different one: under Scale Based Regulation a non-deposit-taking NBFC below one thousand crore rupees in assets generally sits in the Base Layer. Keep the two numbers apart as five hundred crore for systemic importance and one thousand crore for the boundary of the Base Layer.