The directive on displaying healthcare service rates is based on which Act?
- A.Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010
- B.National Medical Commission Act, 2019
- C.Consumer Protection Act, 2019
- D.Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
Correct answer
Explanation
The correct answer is the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010, read with the Clinical Establishments (Central Government) Rules, 2012. Together they form the regulatory framework for clinical establishments, and the Rules require that the rate charged for each type of service and each facility be displayed at a conspicuous place, in the local language as well as in English. Option B governs medical education and the registration of practitioners, not the display of hospital charges. Option C deals with consumer rights and redressal in general and is not the instrument the Health Secretary's letter relies on. Option D regulates the manufacture, sale and quality of drugs and cosmetics. Only the 2010 Act, with its Rules, carries the display obligation that the Centre has asked states to enforce.
Read the full article: Centre Asks States to Display Healthcare Service Rates
Practice Questions
In which languages must clinical establishments display their service rates under the Rules?
- A.English only
- B.Hindi and English only
- C.The local language as well as English
- D.Any one language of the Eighth Schedule
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is the local language as well as English. The Rules require a clinical establishment to put up its rates at a conspicuous place in both, so that patients and the people accompanying them can read the charges without having to ask. Option A would leave out those who do not read English, which defeats the purpose of the provision. Option B is wrong because the requirement is for the local language, which need not be Hindi and will differ from state to state. Option D is not the test laid down: the Rules do not leave the choice of a single language to the establishment. The purpose behind the bilingual requirement is to let patients estimate the likely cost of treatment, plan their spending and avoid disputes over billing.
Whose package rates have states been urged to display prominently, besides those of ordinary patients?
- A.Patients covered by government insurance schemes
- B.Foreign patients arriving on Medical and Ayush Visas
- C.Patients referred from district hospitals
- D.Patients admitted to intensive care
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is foreign patients arriving on Medical and Ayush Visas. The Union Health Secretary's letter asks states and union territories to encourage the prominent display, wherever applicable, of the package rates offered to international patients travelling to India on these visas. The reasoning is that clear pricing lets such patients choose with full information, reduces grievances about pricing and billing, and strengthens India's position as a trusted destination for medical and Ayush care. Options A, C and D describe categories of patients who would of course benefit from transparent rates in general, but none of them is the group singled out in the letter for package rate display. The broader direction remains that every clinical establishment should show its rates where patients can easily see them.
Which major multi-sport Games is India preparing to host in 2030?
- A.Asian Games
- B.Commonwealth Games
- C.Summer Olympic Games
- D.Winter Olympic Games
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is the Commonwealth Games. At the Chennai jubilee the Prime Minister said India is preparing to host the Commonwealth Games of 2030, and that alongside it the country is carrying forward the dream of hosting the Olympics in 2036. He set this in the context of sport being built up as a career, with new sporting facilities and better training and support reaching young athletes, which he said is raising India's standing in world sport. Option C, the Summer Olympic Games, is the event tied to 2036 rather than 2030, so pairing it with the earlier year is the trap in this question. Option D, the Winter Olympic Games, was not mentioned at all. Option A, the Asian Games, is a continental event and no Indian hosting year for it was announced here. Hosting the Olympics also appeared among the resolutions he repeated with the students, along with a developed India by 2047, a top three economy and an Indian on the Moon.
How many Indian universities feature in the latest QS Rankings, against 14 in 2015?
- A.28
- B.36
- C.44
- D.52
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is 52. The Prime Minister said that in the QS Rankings of 2015 only 14 universities from India found a place, and that the latest edition of those rankings carries 52 Indian names. He offered the jump as evidence that the new education policy is lifting the quality of teaching and that institutions in the country are winning wider global recognition, which in turn leaves students with more institutions, more choices and more opportunities. Options A, B and C, namely 28, 36 and 44, are plausible looking intermediate numbers but none of them was the count given for the latest rankings. Aspirants should memorise this as a before and after pair, 14 in 2015 against 52 now, because questions on reports and rankings are usually framed around exactly such a comparison rather than a single year.
The number of universities in India has grown from about 750 in 2014 to more than how many today?
- A.900
- B.1,100
- C.1,300
- D.1,600
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is more than 1,300. Speaking at the jubilee, the Prime Minister said the count of universities in the country stood at about 750 in 2014 and has since crossed 1,300, a near doubling in roughly a decade. He paired that with the figure for colleges, which has moved from about 38,000 to over 52,000, and noted that several new IITs, IIMs, IIITs and AIIMS were set up in the same years. Options A and B, 900 and 1,100, understate the present count and would wrongly suggest much slower growth than the figure he gave. Option D, 1,600, overstates it; no such number was mentioned at the event. For the examination hall the safest way to hold this is as a pair of before and after figures, about 750 against more than 1,300 for universities and about 38,000 against over 52,000 for colleges.