Skip to content
GK24
Indian HistoryMedium

Separate electorates for Muslims were introduced in India by which Act?

  1. A.Indian Councils Act, 1892
  2. B.Indian Councils Act, 1909
  3. C.Government of India Act, 1919
  4. D.Government of India Act, 1935

Correct answer

B. Indian Councils Act, 1909

Explanation

The correct answer is B, Indian Councils Act, 1909. The Morley-Minto Reforms created separate electorates in which Muslim members were elected only by Muslim voters, and for that reason Lord Minto is remembered as the father of communal electorates in India. Option A is wrong because the Act of 1892 had only an indirect and limited system of nomination through local bodies, universities and chambers of commerce, with no communal electorate. Option C is wrong because the Act of 1919 did not introduce the device but extended it to Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians and Europeans. Option D is wrong because the Act of 1935 extended it still further to the depressed classes, women and labour, following the Communal Award of 1932 and the Poona Pact. So 1909 introduced, 1919 extended and 1935 extended again: that progression is itself a favourite question.

Read the full article: Constitutional Developments 1858 to 1947: Acts and PYQs

View all
Q1.Indian HistoryAsked in: SSC CHSL · 16 March, 2023, Shift 4Easy

Which act was passed by the British Government of India to introduce provincial autonomy?

  1. A.Indian Council Act of 1892
  2. B.Government of India Act of 1935
  3. C.Charter Act of 1853
  4. D.Indian Independence Act of 1947
Show answer

Correct answer: B. Government of India Act of 1935

Explanation

The correct answer is B, Government of India Act of 1935. This Act abolished dyarchy in the provinces and made them autonomous units, with ministries responsible to elected provincial legislatures; the first elections under it were held in 1937 and Congress ministries took office in most provinces. Option A is wrong because the Indian Councils Act of 1892 only enlarged the councils, allowed budget discussion and permitted questions to the executive. Option C is wrong because the Charter Act of 1853 belongs to Company rule and is remembered for separating legislative and executive functions and for introducing open competition for the civil service. Option D is wrong because the Indian Independence Act of 1947 did not reform provinces; it ended British rule and created the dominions of India and Pakistan. Remember the pair: 1919 brought dyarchy to the provinces, and 1935 replaced it with provincial autonomy.

Q2.Indian HistoryAsked in: UPSC Civil Services · UPSC Civil Services Exam Official 2022 PHard

In the Government of India Act 1919, the functions of Provincial Government were divided into Reserved and Transferred subjects. Which of the following were treated as Reserved subjects? 1. Administration of Justice 2. Local Self-Government 3. Land Revenue 4. Police. Select the correct answer using the code given below:

  1. A.1, 2 and 3
  2. B.2, 3 and 4
  3. C.1, 3 and 4
  4. D.1, 2 and 4
Show answer

Correct answer: C. 1, 3 and 4

Explanation

The correct answer is C, 1, 3 and 4. Under dyarchy the Governor kept the reserved subjects, which were those touching revenue and coercive power: administration of justice, land revenue, police, irrigation, famine relief, forests and labour relations. Local self-government, along with education, public health, agriculture, industries and excise, belonged to the transferred list, run by Indian ministers answerable to the legislative council. Option A is wrong because it includes local self-government, a transferred subject. Option B is wrong for the same reason, as it too carries local self-government. Option D is wrong because it drops land revenue, the most jealously guarded of the reserved subjects, and adds local self-government. The simple rule for the examination hall is that whatever earned money or kept order was reserved, and whatever spent money on people was transferred.

Q3.Indian HistoryAsked in: Rajasthan · RPSC RAS Prelims 2016 Official PaperMedium

Identify the INCORRECT statement about the Government of India Act 1919:

  1. A.The Government of India Act 1919 came into force in 1921.
  2. B.This Act is also known as Morley Minto Reforms Act.
  3. C.Montagu was the Secretary of State for India and Lord Chelmsford was the Viceroy of India.
  4. D.This Act separated the Central and Provincial subjects.
Show answer

Correct answer: B. This Act is also known as Morley Minto Reforms Act.

Explanation

The correct answer is B, which is the incorrect statement. The Act of 1919 is known as the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms; the Morley-Minto Reforms were the Indian Councils Act of 1909, a decade earlier, remembered for separate electorates. Option A is a correct statement, because the Act was passed in 1919 but its provisions were brought into force in 1921, which is why the first dyarchy ministries date from that year. Option C is correct, since Edwin Montagu was the Secretary of State for India and Lord Chelmsford the Viceroy, and the reforms carry both their names. Option D is correct as well, because for the first time the Act separated central and provincial subjects and gave the provinces their own revenue sources. In a negative question like this, identify the odd nickname first; it is almost always the mismatched pair of names.

Q4.Indian HistoryAsked in: RRB NTPC · 17 June 2022, Shift 2Medium

The Government of India Act, 1919 was passed by the British Parliament on the recommendation of ________.

  1. A.Lord Elgin
  2. B.Edwin Montague
  3. C.Charles I
  4. D.Lord Linlithgow
Show answer

Correct answer: B. Edwin Montague

Explanation

The correct answer is B, Edwin Montague. Edwin Montagu, the Secretary of State for India, issued the declaration of August 1917 promising the gradual development of self-governing institutions, and together with the Viceroy Lord Chelmsford produced the report of 1918 on which the Act of 1919 was based. Option A is wrong because Lord Elgin served as Viceroy in the nineteenth century and had nothing to do with these reforms. Option C is wrong because Charles I was a seventeenth century English king, associated with the early charters of the East India Company, not with twentieth century Indian reform. Option D is wrong because Lord Linlithgow came later: he chaired the Joint Parliamentary Committee on the Bill that became the Act of 1935 and was Viceroy during the Second World War. Keep the chain in mind: Montagu's declaration of 1917, the report of 1918, the Act of 1919 and its enforcement in 1921.

Q5.Indian HistoryAsked in: Bihar · 46th BPSC Prelims (Held in 2004) OfficiaHard

The Chairman of the Joint Parliamentary Committee of the 1935 bill that led to the framing of the Government of India Act of 1935 was

  1. A.Linlithgow
  2. B.James Mcdonald
  3. C.Winston Churchill
  4. D.Clement Attlee
Show answer

Correct answer: A. Linlithgow

Explanation

The correct answer is A, Linlithgow. The White Paper of 1933 on Indian constitutional reform was examined by a Joint Select Committee of the British Parliament chaired by Lord Linlithgow, and the Bill drafted on its report became the Government of India Act of 1935; Linlithgow later served as Viceroy of India from 1936 to 1943. Option B is wrong because Ramsay MacDonald was the British Prime Minister who convened the Round Table Conferences and announced the Communal Award of 1932. Option C is wrong because Winston Churchill was the loudest opponent of the reforms in Parliament, not the chairman of the committee. Option D is wrong because Clement Attlee belongs to the end of the story: as Prime Minister he made the announcement of February 1947 on the transfer of power and sent the Cabinet Mission in 1946. Sort these four by the decade in which each acted.