How many Science and Technology Clusters took part in the fourth All S&T Clusters Meet?
- A.Five
- B.Six
- C.Eight
- D.Eleven
Correct answer
C. Eight
Explanation
The correct answer is eight. Representatives of all eight Science and Technology Clusters joined the deliberations, and each of them made a presentation on its work over the two days. They are the Pune Knowledge Cluster Foundation, the Jodhpur City Knowledge and Innovation Foundation, the Bhubaneswar City Knowledge and Innovation Cluster, Delhi Research Implementation and Innovation or DRIIV, the AMTZ-Vizag Cluster, the Bengaluru Science and Technology Cluster, the Research and Innovation Circle of Hyderabad, and the host PI-RAHI at Chandigarh. Options A and B understate the number, and option D overstates it; none of the three matches the list of clusters that presented at the meet. The clusters were set up as regional innovation ecosystems that pull together academia, research institutions, industry, startups and government to solve regional problems, and the chair called them National Technology Accelerators. Only option C is correct.
Read the full article: Fourth All Science and Technology Clusters Meet in Chandigarh
Practice Questions
Who chaired the Fourth All Science and Technology Clusters Meet held at Chandigarh?
- A.The Union Minister of Science and Technology
- B.The Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India
- C.The Director of IIT Ropar
- D.The Vice-Chancellor of Panjab University
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is the Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India. Prof. Ajay Kumar Sood, who holds that post, chaired the meet on 9 and 10 October 2026 at Panjab University in Chandigarh, and the Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser runs the whole clusters programme. He was joined by Scientific Secretary Parvinder Maini and Vishal Choudhary, Scientist-F in his office. Option A is wrong because the Union Minister of Science and Technology was not named as the chair of this meeting. Option C is wrong although the Director of IIT Ropar did attend, as a participant rather than as the chair; the same is true of the Director of IIT Jodhpur. Option D is wrong for the same reason: the Vice-Chancellor of Panjab University took part because the host campus was hers, not because she presided. Only option B is correct.
On whose recommendation was the Science and Technology Clusters programme conceived in 2020?
- A.NITI Aayog
- B.The Prime Minister's Science, Technology and Innovation Advisory Council
- C.The University Grants Commission
- D.The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is the Prime Minister's Science, Technology and Innovation Advisory Council, known by the short form PM-STIAC. The clusters programme of the Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser was conceived in 2020 after that council recommended it, and it brings academia, research institutions, industry, startups and government together to tackle regional challenges through science, technology and innovation. Option A is wrong because NITI Aayog, the government's policy think tank, was not credited with the recommendation. Option C is wrong as the University Grants Commission deals with higher education standards and funding rather than with innovation clusters of this kind. Option D is wrong because the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research runs its own chain of national laboratories and is not the body whose advice created the programme. Only option B is correct.
By which year does the Government aim to achieve the national objectives of strategic sovereignty referred to by the Minister?
- A.2030
- B.2035
- C.2040
- D.2047
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is 2047. The Minister asked industry to accelerate innovation and scale up technological capability so that India meets the national objectives set for 2047 and strengthens its strategic sovereignty, a year that marks a century of independence. Option A, 2030, is wrong in this context because that year is attached to a different goal in the same speech, the bioeconomy target of US$300 billion, and mixing the two is the commonest error here. Options B and C name years that do not appear in the address. The Minister also linked the 2047 goal to practical conditions: indigenous technology, dependable energy supply, private participation in research under the Research, Development and Innovation initiative, and partnerships among government, industry, academia and start-ups that can scale a successful innovation quickly.
Dr. Jitendra Singh made these remarks while addressing the annual session of which industry body?
- A.FICCI
- B.PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry
- C.CII
- D.ASSOCHAM
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is the PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The Minister spoke at the 121st Annual Session of PHDCCI in New Delhi, where industry leaders, entrepreneurs and other stakeholders had gathered to discuss growth and innovation priorities. He said such chambers can act as the bridge between researchers and businesses, facilitating investment and helping an innovation travel from the laboratory to a prototype and then to a market-ready product. Options A, C and D name FICCI, CII and ASSOCHAM, which are also major Indian industry associations, but the address in question was delivered at the PHDCCI session and the edition number, the 121st, belongs to that body. Remember the edition along with the name, since paper setters often ask for the number of the session rather than only the host organisation.
What is the target set for India’s bioeconomy by 2030?
- A.US$150 billion
- B.US$196 billion
- C.US$300 billion
- D.US$500 billion
Show answer
Explanation
The correct answer is US$300 billion. The bioeconomy has grown from roughly US$10 billion in 2014 to about US$196 billion, crossing the US$195 billion mark, and the ambition stated is to take it to US$300 billion by 2030. Option B, US$196 billion, is the present size rather than the target, and is therefore the most tempting wrong answer: a candidate who remembers only one figure will often pick the one just read. Option A understates the current size, so it cannot be a forward target. Option D names a round number that has not been set for this decade. The Minister tied the growth to an expanding biotechnology start-up ecosystem, presenting life sciences and advanced research as a source of new enterprises, domestic capability and economic value rather than only of published papers.