Fundamental duties were not placed in Part III of the Indian Constitution because Part III is ______.
- A.non-justiciable
- B.justiciable
- C.not enforceable
- D.absolute
Show answer
Correct answer: B. justiciable
Explanation
The correct answer is B, justiciable. Part III holds the fundamental rights, and those rights are justiciable: a citizen may go straight to the Supreme Court under Article 32 or to a High Court under Article 226 and have them enforced. The fundamental duties are moral obligations that no court enforces of its own motion, so putting them in Part III would have sat oddly beside enforceable rights; they were given a new Part IVA instead, as Article 51A. They came in through the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 on the advice of the Swaran Singh Committee — ten duties then, and an eleventh on a parent's duty to educate a child added by the 86th Amendment of 2002. Option A is wrong because it is Part IV, the Directive Principles, that is non-justiciable. Option C is wrong for the same reason, since Part III rights are enforceable. Option D is wrong because fundamental rights are not absolute; the State may place reasonable restrictions on them. Exam tip: Part III justiciable, Part IV not, Part IVA duties in Article 51A.