NLMC Board Clears Assets Worth Over Rs 5,000 Crore

The answer is over Rs 5,000 crore. At its twenty-first board meeting, held on 18 September 2026, the National Land Monetization Corporation considered and recommended proposals covering assets of that value. What those assets are matters as much as the figure: surplus land and buildings, identified because they no longer serve the purpose they were acquired for.

The remaining options are round figures of the kind that make plausible distractors in a question about money, but none of them appears in the announcement. Two details are worth carrying with the figure, since a question may ask for either instead: it was the twenty-first meeting of the board, and the same sitting approved the Annual Financial Statements and Directors' Report for 2025-26.

The answer is Central Public Sector Enterprises and other government entities. NLMC does not simply buy and sell. It works alongside whichever body owns the property, identifying which assets are suitable, carrying out due diligence, arranging a valuation and then structuring the process, with transparency, efficiency and value realisation as its stated priorities.

The other options describe owners the release does not mention. Option B in particular points in the wrong direction entirely, since this is public property being put to use, not a rescue of private firms. The purpose behind the whole exercise is worth remembering alongside the answer: unlocking the value of assets that sit underused on government books, which is why the corporation exists at all.

One more point of wording: monetisation is not always a sale. Depending on the structure, the state may lease an asset or take in a partner while keeping the title, so ownership does not necessarily change hands.

The answer is 2025-26. Alongside the monetisation proposals, the twenty-first board meeting cleared the Annual Financial Statements and the Directors' Report for that financial year. These are routine items of corporate business, but they are exactly the kind of specific that a question will pick out precisely because candidates skim past them.

Option D is the strongest distractor, since the meeting itself took place during that year rather than after it, and accounts are approved for a year that has closed rather than one still running. Hold the three specifics from this meeting together and the whole item is covered: the twenty-first board meeting, assets worth over Rs 5,000 crore recommended, and accounts approved for 2025-26.

A small habit helps with items like this: when a release names a financial year, note whether it has closed or is still running, because that alone usually settles the question.