Skip to content
GK24
Indian EconomyHardAsked in: CDS · CDS (I) 2023, 16 Apr 2023

The computation of poverty in terms of Monthly Per Capita Consumption Expenditure (MPCE) based on the Mixed Reference Period was recommended by the

  1. A.Lakdawala Committee
  2. B.Tendulkar Committee
  3. C.Dandekar Committee
  4. D.Alagh Committee

Correct answer

B. Tendulkar Committee

Explanation

The correct answer is B, Tendulkar Committee. The expert group headed by Suresh Tendulkar, which reported in 2009, recommended measuring poverty through MPCE on the Mixed Reference Period. Under this method, spending on five rarely bought items, namely clothing, footwear, durable goods, education and institutional medical care, is recorded over the last 365 days, and all other items over the last 30 days. Tendulkar also moved away from the old calorie norm and used one poverty line basket for rural and urban India, covering spending on health and education. By this method, India's poverty ratio came to 21.9 per cent in 2011-12. A is wrong, because the Lakdawala group of 1993 used the Uniform Reference Period and state-wise poverty lines. C is wrong, because the Dandekar and Rath study of 1971 based poverty on an intake of 2,250 calories a day. D is wrong, because the Alagh task force of 1979 fixed calorie norms of 2,400 rural and 2,100 urban. Exam tip: Alagh 1979 calories, Lakdawala 1993 URP, Tendulkar 2009 MRP, Rangarajan 2014.

View all
Q2.Indian EconomyAsked in: CDS · CDS-I 2018, GKHard

Consider the following statements about impact of tax : 1. A tax is shifted forward to consumers if the demand is inelastic relative to supply. 2. A tax is shifted backward to producers if the supply is relatively more inelastic than demand. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. A.1 only
  2. B.2 only
  3. C.Both 1 and 2
  4. D.Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer
Correct answer: C. Both 1 and 2

The burden of a tax falls more heavily on whichever side of the market is less elastic, the side that cannot easily walk away.

Q5.Indian EconomyAsked in: CDS · CDS-II 2017, GKHard

Why was constitutional amendment needed for introducing GST?

  1. A.States were not willing to agree with the Union for introduction of GST without amendment in the Constitution.
  2. B.GST was to be implemented on concurrent base and Article 246 was inadequate for such a case.
  3. C.The Empowered Committee of Finance Ministers had recommended for constitutional amendment.
  4. D.The GST Council had recommended for constitutional amendment so that its power enhances.
Show answer
Correct answer: B. GST was to be implemented on concurrent base and Article 246 was inadequate for such a case.

GST is levied by the Union and the States together on the same supply, and Article 246, which splits taxing powers between them through separate lists, did not allow such a concurrent tax.