Which High Court received the largest number of the fourteen appointments?
- A.Karnataka High Court
- B.Jharkhand High Court
- C.Delhi High Court
- D.High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
Correct answer
C. Delhi High Court
Explanation
The answer is the Delhi High Court, which received seven of the fourteen, half the total on its own. Of those seven, two were appointed as Judges and the other five as Additional Judges, a split the release sets out separately and which is itself worth noting.
The remaining seven were divided three ways. Jharkhand took three as Judges, Karnataka took three as Additional Judges, and the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh took one as a Judge. That last court is worth a second look for a different reason: a single High Court serves both Union Territories, which is a fact examiners like on its own. So the order by size runs Delhi, then Jharkhand and Karnataka level, then Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.
Read the full article: President Appoints 14 Judges to Four High Courts
Practice Questions
How many judicial officers were appointed as Judges and Additional Judges in the September 2026 announcement?
- A.Ten
- B.Twelve
- C.Fourteen
- D.Sixteen
Show answer
Correct answer: C. Fourteen
Explanation
The answer is fourteen. The Ministry of Law and Justice announced the elevation of fourteen serving judicial officers, spread over four High Courts. The largest share went to Delhi, which took seven of them, two as Judges and five as Additional Judges. Jharkhand received three as Judges, Karnataka three as Additional Judges, and one officer was appointed a Judge of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.
Adding those up is the safest way to hold the figure: seven and three and three and one. Candidates who remember only the number of courts, which is four, or only the Delhi share, which is seven, will miss this. The other options are round numbers close enough to be tempting but none of them matches the announcement.
Under the Constitution, who appoints Judges of a High Court, and after consulting whom?
- A.The Prime Minister, after consulting the Law Minister
- B.The President, after consulting the Chief Justice of India
- C.The Chief Justice of India, after consulting the President
- D.The Governor of the State, after consulting the High Court Chief Justice
Show answer
Correct answer: B. The President, after consulting the Chief Justice of India
Explanation
The answer is the President, after consulting the Chief Justice of India. The release is explicit on both halves: the power is one the Constitution confers on the President, and it is exercised after consultation with the Chief Justice of India. The order of those two steps matters, because a question will sometimes reverse them.
Option C does exactly that reversal and is the strongest distractor. The Prime Minister and the Law Minister have no constitutional role in the appointment itself, which rules out option A. A Governor does figure in consultation for High Court appointments under the constitutional scheme, but the appointing authority is not the Governor, so option D fails on the same point. Hold the pair as consultation first, warrant afterwards.